User talk:JulieFord

Hello, JulieFord. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

I emphasize the above again; you must disclose your employer if you expect to receive compensation for your contributions. See WP:PAID. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Advertising Alliance of Canada[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Digital Advertising Alliance of Canada, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://youradchoices.ca/the-principles/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Digital Advertising Alliance of Canada, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Also, please don't restore your COI declaration to the article again. It belongs on the article's talk page where it was moved. Meters (talk) 17:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that simply declaring your conflict of interest does not give Wikipedia the right to reuse material from your group's copyrighted website. If you wish to give us the right to use the material (and you have the right to do so) you must follow the instructions linked above before we can use the material. Meters (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]