User talk:Juansidious

Welcome!

Hello, Juansidious, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

May 2007[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Christopher Monroy. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Coren 03:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Christopher Monroy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Coren 03:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA[edit]

Hi Juansidious. I wanted to leave you notice that I've closed your RFA early because it had little to no chance of success and further comments were unlikely to be more helpful than whatever ego deflation a bunch more opposes would cause. In any case, I suggest you follow the advice of the people who commented in your RFA and start doing some vandal fighting. Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol is a good place to start. Eventually, a Wikipedia:Editor review is a good way to get more feedback before an eventual second try at adminship. Feel free to drop by my tlak page with any questions. Good luck and cheers!--Chaser - T 07:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Larry West[edit]

In my understanding, "incident" is not a proper noun. Please explain your reasoning. --Darkbane 17:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the case for Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:MOS#Sections and headings, which states: In a heading, capitalize only the first letter of the first word and the first letter of any proper nouns, and leave all of the other letters in lowercase. Example: “Rules and regulations”, not “Rules and Regulations”. --Darkbane 17:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andre2907[edit]

Just so you know, the Hot100Brazil Wikipedia entry there is absolutely no vandalism. The Hot100 Brazil isn't an official chart and there's absolutely no relation with the ABPD, Associação Brasileira Produtora de Discos. The site is fake. The official cite of the Brazilian phonographic industry is http://www.abpd.org.br/ and there's no official album charts in the site, just the annual one. Billboard magazine does in fact compile a Brazilian list and there's no similarity at all with the Hot100Brazil charts, which lead us all to believe the site is FAKE.

Emo (slang)[edit]

Hello. I'm in agreement with the recent revert you made to Emo (slang). You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --Martian.knight 01:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm, I used to write my own but got too lazy now I just use twinkle. Even this earlier message was made using it. My time at school gets pretty boring... --Martian.knight 01:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Please don't revert it, unless it consists of deleting other people's comments or blanking the page. I like the whole "You meddling kids!" response that I get. --Juansidious 13:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Gestapo[edit]

Thanks for the heads-up! As you might imagine, it is no surprise at all that such an article has been nominated (no doubt, by a deletion gestapo contributor) for deletion. thanks again. -- GeĸrίtzĿ._..•˚^˚ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gekritzl (talk • contribs) 03:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge templates[edit]

The date syntax is: {{Merge|other arguments|date=August 2007}}, but if you leave the date off it will be added by a WP:BOT. Rich Farmbrough, 19:27 23 September 2007 (GMT).

this is a school's ip address, kids probably mess around on here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.216.29.125 (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks, not a bad catch really, in fact a whopper! ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 02:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top Thrill Dragster[edit]

Hey, I noticed you changed the range on the page, Top Thrill Dragster's control system will give a warning anytime the wind gusts above 20 mph, then you have to reset it, it will warn you again at 25, then 30, and at 35 mph it shuts the ride down, a range is the simplest way of explaining that each time the wind ratchets up, you may have to reset 3 or 4 warnings.98.28.69.39 (talk) 04:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bit Lordy (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ with Bit Lordy's comment; for an alternative point of view, you may wish to check out this link:

meta:Metapedianism
This page is a soft redirect.

Just thought I'd put my 10 cents in----Shanoman (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How old are you?[edit]

Is there a lower age limit for editors or registered users? Your photo makes you look a little young for the website. Perhaps you should assuage doubters on your user page. Yesitsnot (talk) 08:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Make sure to keep Wikipedia as your top priority. We need more editors like you. Just crack down on vandals all day. Yesitsnot (talk) 05:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:John Fields in 2009 in Washington.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:John Fields in 2009 in Washington.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 18:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal[edit]

Hello Juansidious, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Metal. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject metal, please add your username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Active Users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Members. Thank you.

Acid Breaks[edit]

On the section acid breaks, in the article breakbeat; what did you mean by other forms of electronic music, or in other words what did you mean to put before that? I tried to edit it to make the reader better understand your point, but I wasn't sure what you were talking about. Did you mean that acid breaks shared in other sub genres of electronic music? Maybe you weren't even the one who originally wrote that; either way, please let me know on my talk page, thanks. Lighthead (talk) 21:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Thompson[edit]

Hi Juansidious - here's a blast from your distant past [1] - I think the quote you added may have been a misquote. It was at least not something supported by the sources. --Salimfadhley (talk) 22:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Fields in 2009 in Washington.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Fields in 2009 in Washington.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:John Fields in 2005.JPG[edit]

The file File:John Fields in 2005.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]