User talk:Jpfagerback

Bilder

Heisann! Ser du har lasta opp mange fine bilde som eg gjerne vil kopiera vidare til Commons. Dei fleste har BSD-lisens, så det går greit. Men nokre, som Image:Tryvann tower 27may2005.jpg og Image:Flesberg stave church.jpg, manglar lisensen. Er han ganske enkelt gløymt, eller utelatt med vilje? -- Ranveig 08:09, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Det var en forglemmelse, som nå er rettet. --Jpfagerback 21:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Maresiev

Why did you move Alexei Maresiev to Alexei Petrovich Maresiev? I don't think they use patronimics in English Wikipedia. Please reconsider. KNewman 11:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

I didn't move anything. I was just removing double redirect. Someone else must have moved it and thru that created the double redirect.--Jpfagerback 12:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Meat Loaf album

Meat Loaf's new album page has got the wrong capitalization conventions. The "out" is supposed to be capitalized but people keep reverting my page moves. Why is this? I am very confused. Thanks. Aaрон Кинни (t) 02:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

First off, it is not me which revert the change. In English the standard is that all words in titles are capitalized except for "of", "the", "in", etc when these are in the middle of a title. The naming convension you find on the CD itself or at any other source is the personal choice of the publisher. Though according to the standard the word "out" should be written "Out" in a title. --Jpfagerback 04:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

It's kind of hard to tell this early in the stages. But we'll see as it comes out. I still think we should go by conventional standards and not what the company wants to do, seeing as we are an academic forum. Aaрон Кинни (t) 21:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Narnia redirects

Greetings, I'm new to redirecting pages, and noticed that you deleted the content in the pages redirected to List of places in The Chronicles of Narnia. Is that better than leaving the content there? I was going to delete it when I originally redirected those pages, but I noticed that the categories would be lost, so I left everything alone and simply redirected. LloydSommerer 18:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Redirects don't need categories. Content also show up with wrong redirects in the double redirect page. --Jpfagerback 21:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

AMD at The Glen redirects

Thanks for fixing the double redirects at AMD at The Glen for me. I would have done it myself but I don't have AWB at work and there were kind of a lot :). Recury 20:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I do a few double redirect removals when I feel like it... --Jpfagerback 21:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

link to 3D

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something 3D, please do not link to 3D, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as 3D computer graphics by writing out [[3D computer graphics|3D]] Regards, -- Jeff3000 22:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I'll have it in mind. --Jpfagerback 22:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Language links

I see that in a recent edit you created links to many words on the page Animal sounds in foreign languages. However, the articles you linked to in most cases were not articles about the languages. For example, [[English]] is a page about the various uses of this word; the article about the language is at [[English language|English]]. It would be appreciated if you would fix this large number of incorrect links, rather than leaving the work for others to do. --Russ Blau (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Jupiler League Results - September 2006

Why did you put the redirect to Jupiler League results September 2006 back? I removed it because it was automatically created when the page was moved, but I've also removed all links to it and I don't see why anyone would link to that page again. :S --Pelotas^talk 09:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Then you should mark it for fast delete so that an administrator can delete it. I was making deadend pages not being deadends anymore at the time.--Jpfagerback 09:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Charles Henry Carter

Hi, thanks for casting a critical eye of this article. Was only my second attempt and still learning a lot, didn't really think about the internal links at the time (haven't really developed my Wikibrain as yet)! Proberton 12:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Definitions of Black People

Why are you reverting the title to the offensive and prejudiced "Definitions" of black people? You can easily read the arguments against it. It was originally called "Who is Black" (like the article "Who is Jewish"), you do not change the Jewish article to "Definitions of Jews". So don't change this one! --Zaphnathpaaneah 06:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I was just removing a dead end page. I've just added some links to the article.--Jpfagerback 20:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Petter C.G. Sundt

A tag has been placed on Petter C.G. Sundt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Avruch^Talk 00:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Petter C.G. Sundt

A tag has been placed on Petter C.G. Sundt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. β^_command 16:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm!

I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 07:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. --Flash176 (talk) 16:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Johan Jørgen Holst 7jun2005.jpg

File:Johan Jørgen Holst 7jun2005.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Johan Jørgen Holst 7jun2005.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Johan Jørgen Holst 7jun2005.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Hajo Herrmann

Please do NOT an edit like this unless you have a RELIABLE source. See also discussionpage & filehistory. Thanks. Kind regards, Maasje (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

OK. --Jpfagerback (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Anton Blom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cappelen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Great bot tool! Thanks for the info. --Jpfagerback (talk) 11:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited October 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Defense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jpfagerback. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jpfagerback. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jpfagerback. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)