User talk:JonCl

Welcome!

Hello, JonCl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Persona 5, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning - if you delete sourced content without explanation and discussion again, you will be blocked from editing. Don't just keep deleting it without giving a reason - voice your concern through edit summaries and the article's talk page. Sergecross73 msg me 17:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Persona 5, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 19:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice[edit]

Your recent editing history at Persona 5 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jim1138 (talk) 03:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for 3 days for edit warring.

I gave you a last warning to start discussing through edit summaries or article talk pages. You continued reverting without doing either. Its nice you started a discussion on one of the editor's talk page, but that was after you reverted once again without explanation.

If you want to pursue this issue after your block in three days:

Follow WP:BRD. Don't just keep reverting. Discuss on the article's talk page. That's right here.
After starting a discussion, only make the edit again if there is consensus that supports the change.

Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 12:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Starting to make the same edits that got you blocked before[edit]

It looks like you're still engaged in an edit war at Persona 5.

The concerns you raise about the source cited is legitimate. However, multiple editors oppose the removal. Your next step is to discuss the situation at Talk:Persona 5. You can explain your concerns, they can reply and explain why they think the source is appropriate. That said, because Wikipedia operates on the consensus system, you'll need to get the editors to agree—to form a new consensus—to change away from the current version. You must get new consensus before making the change.

If you continue to edit war or remove material without explanation, you run the risk of being blocked for a longer term than before. —C.Fred (talk) 00:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have not only continued to edit war, ignoring blocks for doing so, but have also attempted to evade a block by use of another account, the length of the block has been made indefinite. If you continue to abuse multiple accounts to evade Wikipedia policy, it will be possible to protect the article involved to prevent you from editing it, but doing so will cause inconvenience for legitimate editors as well as for you, so please don't make that necessary. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]