User talk:Johnny-bollock-rotten

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

Notability of Greater Argentina[edit]

A tag has been placed on Greater Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 15:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Foreign relations of Argentina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Alexf⁴² 20:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Portal:Argentina/Did you know. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Alexf⁴² 20:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have previously asked you to stop adding links to a non-existent page. The page you are linking to was deleted for cause. If you feel it is an important article and you can show notability by citing reliable sources, please go ahead and do so. In the meantime, please refrain from adding links to a deleted page in articles. Try discussing it in the Talk page first. Thank you -- Alexf⁴² 20:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It pains me to have to block you but you have not responded in your talk page, nor have you engaged in discussion in the articles' talk pages as requested. Maybe a short block will give you pause, and time to read Wikipedia's policies. If you persist in entering links to deleted articles, instead of asking in the Talk Pages if it would be OK, and citing reliable sources, you will be bocked again for longer periods of time, up to an indefinite time as per the blocking policy. We would prefer to have a potential good contributor instead of having to block users, but policies must be followed.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent links to deleted articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf⁴² 12:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Foreign relations of Argentina. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Alexf⁴² 18:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enough going around. This is the last warning. You keep adding the same edit to Irredentism, Foreign relations of Argentina and Portal:Argentina/Did you know, even after you were asked to stop, properly source and explain. Consider this your last warning. Next edit on any of these subjects on pages should be on their Talk pages explaining you position. If you repeat the edit warring you will be blocked. If you have any questions about Wikipedia's policies, which have been pointed to you, or any other complaint, please take it to ANI instead of adding German text to my Talk page as in this edit (which I do not understand, personal attacks as in this edit and vandalism as in this edit). -- Alexf⁴² 18:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Vsmith (talk) 18:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Alexf, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Alexf⁴² 13:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source for Image:Cascadia.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cascadia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Cascadia.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cascadia.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Alexf. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Alexf⁴² 18:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Alexf. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. res 2216 firestar 18:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Alexf. res 2216 firestar 18:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf⁴² 19:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Alexf, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Alexf. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf^(talk) 22:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Alexf^(talk) 12:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]