User talk:Joebrown1958
My apologies[edit]
I'd like to apologize to you on behalf of the administrative community, the editor who warned you previously did so incorrectly as your edits were not vandalism. However, you are currently engaged in an edit war, and I will leave you a warning to that effect shortly. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC) See the reference here. I've been reading articles that are NOT reviewing facts, rather they are reviewing incorrect articles and Wikipedia.
Ref: http://tdcj.state.tx.us/death_row/dr_info/wesbrookcoy.html</ref> I'm attempting to correct a long litany of error. This man shot 5, killed 4 people but is being sentenced to death for only 3! Also the incorrect firearm is being identified. It was a .30/.06 rifle. a .36 caliber is a black powder single shot rifle. These mistakes were made years ago and are being continued today. This is the last press this will get and due to inaction it will be wrong!
Joebrown1958 (talk) 18:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
February 2016[edit]
Your recent editing history at Coy Wayne Wesbrook shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The count of 5 killed is incorrect. The facts are being checked against Newspaper articles that are checking facts using Wikipedia[edit]
The count of 5 killed is incorrect. I've made several attempts to get this corrected. The original police report listed 5 shot but only 4 were killed. One woman survived. As well He is being executed for 3 murders. The facts are being checked against Newspaper articles that are checking facts using Wikipedia. The original report also contained 1 minor error the rifle was a .30/.06 not a 36 caliber.Joebrown1958 (talk) 15:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Coy Wayne Wesbrook Information is incorrect (March 10)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coy Wayne Wesbrook Information is incorrect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Joebrown1958,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
|
MfD nomination of Draft:Coy Wayne Wesbrook Information is incorrect[edit]
Draft:Coy Wayne Wesbrook Information is incorrect, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Coy Wayne Wesbrook Information is incorrect and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Coy Wayne Wesbrook Information is incorrect during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 18:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- In case you did not see them, the following questions were asked by MatthewVanitas when declining this draft:
- Where have you tried to get people to listen? Have you tried posting your comments at Talk:Coy Wayne Wesbrook (the talk page for that article)? And have you tried just making the needed correction yourself, and clearly citing it to a source which is correct?
- I should be interested to hear your replies. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- On further investigation, you are just wasting our time. Which of Gloria Jean Coons, Antonio Cruz, Kelly Hazlip, Diana Money, and Anthony Rogers did he not kill and why do you make that claim? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:03, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Diana Money was not killed. In fact she testified at Coy Wesbrook's trial. I don't have time or money to order trial transcripts and death certificates for you. She died 2 years after Wesprook's conviction and he was never charged with her murder.Joebrown1958 (talk) 01:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Replied at talk:Coy Wayne Wesbrook. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)