User talk:Jhbeard

License tagging for Image:New-temple-street.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:New-temple-street.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Herenton.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Herenton.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to W.W. Herenton[edit]

Hi Jhbeard. I saw an edit you recently made to the Herenton article. I noticed that the text you added was copied from the Memphis city website. While the federal government cannot, by law, claim copyright in any of its works, the same does not apply to state and city governments. I removed the text, but feel free to reword the material (put it in your own words, change the order of the information presented, etc.) and re-add it to the article if you like. Thanks! · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 22:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's fine. Wikipedia and its numerous policies and guidelines can be quite cumbersome for a newcomer (I was there not too long ago). I see you've reworded the text, thanks for doing that (Wikipedia has to be careful about copyright violations). I'll check it more carefully later to make sure that it adheres to the neutral point of view policy. Thanks for your addition, and let me know if you have any questions. · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 22:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help with sources[edit]

I did an Article on the Historically Black College or University band at Tennessee State University, the Aristocrat of Bands. Most of the sources (especially for the older history) for this article are either video proof that is part of a documentary, people who are still alive (myself included) that participated with this program, and old newspaper articles that are in the school archives. What else could be a "credible third party source"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhbeard (talk • contribs) 21:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jh,

Welcome! :)

I did a search on NewspaperArchive, but couldn't find anything on the Aristocrat of Bands. However, this search on Google News Archive did pull up articles in several newspapers: The Anniston Star, USA Today, etc. Those are all reliable third-party sources, and should definitely be included in the article. There's also nothing wrong with adding in a few of the old school newspaper articles, which could be useful to readers... you just shouldn't rely on them entirely. Also, you can also cite video documentaries, provided they are independent of the source.

We appreciate your work on this article, and I'd be glad to assist you in improving it. The article is on a notable subject, and should definitely be included on Wikipedia. Firsfron of Ronchester 22:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:8b22.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:8b22.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]