User talk:JetLover/Archive 6
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.[edit]
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
RFA[edit]
My nomination of, Adam, (CastAStone) is legit. Please see my comment in the RFA Discussion. -DavidJ710 (talk) 04:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your attention to RfA, I am sorry about the chaos my nomination costs. I guess, I'll stick with editing until I am not such a noob... Keep up the good work. -DavidJ710 (talk) 05:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Nburden's RFA[edit]
Thanks for the advice, and your consideration. I appreciate it, and hope to continue to have a positive impact on the encyclopedia. Nburden (T) 08:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
User harassment[edit]
To continue the thread over here...despite the confusion that led to Bill's comment about your admin/non-admin status, I have to tell you that I was impressed with your patience back when dealing with TougHHead. You might want to think about becoming an admin yourself one of these days. It's a hard job, whatever you do will be criticized by someone, and you'll garner your own set of stalkers, but it's also a very necessary job, and we need good people to do it. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 14:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Score[edit]
It is true I did score that high.And I don't have any respect. I wonder why? Hardcore Hak 15:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Hardcore Hak If you have respect please sign my Geust Book.
Relax, man..[edit]
I'm not the Charles Manson. I just think it's a cool name. Hope that helps.--THIS IS CHARLES MANSON 00:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.[edit]
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: User:ClueBot III/Run[edit]
Indeed it was a test. Thank you for the note, but I did revert myself ([1]). Cassie Puma (talk) 00:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't telling User:ClueBot to stop running, I was testing User:ClueBot III, an archival bot. ClueBot III hasn't made a single edit since over 2 hours ago, and I wanted to experiment and see if saying False would make a difference. Cassie Puma (talk) 00:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I understand spam. My question was why was TrueFocus considered spam?[edit]
I already apologized for inappropriately adding TrueFocus to focus stacking. That was due to ignorance not mischief. If two products are mentioned under the focus stacking section of depth of field, why can't TrueFocus be mentioned as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.84.35 (talk) 03:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps they are notable products. Can you also recall what the article said? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I can't really remember. It said something like it can take a picture without the delay that the normal autofocus cameras have. It also focuses all planes simultaneously. There's no need for moving parts. Stuff like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.84.35 (talk • contribs)
Sorry, but that sounds like advertising, something that displays all the functions in a product without an encyclopedic tone. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
It may be, but aren't those functions notable? Those types of comparisons are made between anything. Is it just because it's a product that makes it advertising? I'm sorry I don't have the best ability to write an encyclopedic tone, but can't someone else do that? I always here about people who only go around fixing grammar and stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.84.35 (talk) 03:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- You can go here and someone will create your article and fix it up. Just be sure to follow the instructions. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
So why was it considered advertising again? 75.66.84.35 (talk) 03:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Probably because it did not read like an encyclopedia entry, but rather something to encourage a buyer. I cannot see the article, unfortunatley. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
You aren't an administrator?75.66.84.35 (talk) 03:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, no. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Casey dreier[edit]
There was an unsourced allegation that he exposed himself. That's why I warned for writing attack articles. —C.Fred (talk) 05:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Ryan serhant[edit]
Or, as you more correctly put it, Ryan Serhant. Thanks for moving this article; I suppose I've been on new page patrol for so long that it looks perfectly natural not to have a capital letter at the beginning of your last name. I also appreciate your having tagged it for notability, which nicely solved my dilemma about its prospective deletion; I felt there was just barely enough notability to keep it but it could sure use some bolstering, and this way some soap fan may provide some. My thanks for two helpful contributions. Accounting4Taste:talk 05:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- My pleasure -- give credit where credit is due, and it was due. I've left a note about the article on the talk page of the Soap Opera Task Force and hope they'll pick up the ball and run with it. Accounting4Taste:talk 05:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
User talk pages[edit]
Hi, JetLover. I noticed that you've warned at least one user about their edits. Upon them removing those warnings, you restored them and placed a template, I presume made by you, indicating that such actions are not within policy and should not be done. However, as read at WP:BLANKING, "Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history." Also check out WP:DRC. Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Lara❤Love 07:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- I don't remember. I tried looking back through your contribs to find it, but didn't. The template has been edited to remove the comment about not blanking. If the vandalism continues after they blank their page, then you can restore the removed warnings while adding the next. Otherwise, assume good faith that they've read it and understand. The exemption is shared IPs. Warnings from those should not be blanked. Regards, Lara❤Love 01:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks for letting me know! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Checkuser case completed[edit]
Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 17:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC).
Done (after a couple of tries to find a good revision). I also declined the unblock request and protected the page. I was initially going to leave the request for someone else to review, but, the next time I checked my watchlist, the situation was quickly deteriorating, and it was nigh time to nip it in the bud. — TKD::Talk 04:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Deleting my message to another user[edit]
Why did you delete my message to another user? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Ahh... thanks! --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Thanks, and happy editing! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 23:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Sultan Uddin doesn't meet speedy deletion criteria under G7, which you tagged it for. If you check the history, you'll see that other users have made substantial contributions to the page (e.g., cleanup), making the page not meet that particular criterion. Please check the page history before making G7 taggings in future. Spebi 00:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, it's not okay, because it only applies if "the page's only substantial content was added by its author", and by judging the page history, he wasn't the only user to make substantial changes. Therefore the tag is invalid. If the author could request deletion without the "other substantial changes from other users" rule, authors could be tagging United States, Wikipedia, even Main Page for deletion. Spebi 00:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- I nominated it for deletion: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Uddin. Thanks. Redrocketboy 00:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Codelyoko193[edit]
What do you think we should do to get Angie to listen? Time and time again, she continues this behavior as if she was never talked to. Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 01:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Angie Y.[edit]
Jet, Angie made another POV edit. Placing the word finally in the context it was means that she is on a side of the character, and not being neutral. Do you think it is time for WP:ANI, or do you think this was too little? Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 22:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- If I were to make an RfC, would you co it with me? Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 00:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)\
Hm... we could do it now. It may take a while, because we have to find all the links... Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 00:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. I was doing it, but it would've taken me a while. Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 01:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
You shouldn't apologize for making the RfC. She deserved it. Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 01:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
RfA Thanks[edit]
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which was successful with a vote of 33/7/4. Special thanks go to Epbr123 for nominating me and Pedro for the offer of help.
I am honoured by the trust placed in me by the community. I hope to repay this by the wise use of the tools, which I intend to use gradually. Mop & bucket is on the Christmas list - honest. Keith D (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.[edit]
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Neville neville[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Neville neville, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/. Thank you. I realize you haven't been directly involved, but have tagged one of the many sibling pages that popped up in the past two days Toddst1 (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
Appreciate the reversions. I wish vandals would learn to spell "spatula'> Acroterion (talk) 04:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy Holidays[edit]
Marlith T/C 00:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Christmas Card[edit]
Jet, I'm curious about your report of User:Mighty Bitter Sweet Star at WP:AIV. This user has no edits. Wrong user name perhaps? Caknuck (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- You indicate that this might be an account of User:MascotGuy. Without contributions, there is no evidence to this effect. Since the user has not edits, WP:AIV is not the place to make the report. Best to make a report at either WP:SSP or WP:ANI. — ERcheck (talk) 00:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Need diffs[edit]
See Wikipedia:SSP#User:MascotGuy, the submitter said you could provide diffs. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:02, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
re:Arab Tribune[edit]
I expanded the Arab tribune. l@@k!
--
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.[edit]
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Barnstars[edit]
Thank You for the barnstar.I moved it to user:1bookfan/User Awards please post any future awards to me there. --1bookfan 02:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
cool[edit]
Adminship[edit]
- I know you've already turned down this request, but would you be willing for me to co-nominate you? I'm hoping it'll reinstate your confidence in RFA. Best regards, Rt. 17:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.[edit]
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:23, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Untitled[edit]
Thestationx1 (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)thanks man, i'm trying to learn how to do all the code, i am teaching myself. I was copying and pasting code from other wiki pages and was slowly getting there. I thought it was a good one to do as no one else had done it yet... i just didn't feel that I was given a proper chance to finish off my page, now i'm scepticle as to bother trying another one or not.
+ thanks.Thestationx1 (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks[edit]
Dear JetLover, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).
Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.
Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E talk 12:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
re: VPP Suggestion to reduce CAT:CSD[edit]
In case you did not see it, an editor has invited discussion at MediaWiki talk:Newarticletext. I have some comments there. Sbowers3 (talk) 14:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
I've asked more questions. I thought you may want to read his answers. The Transhumanist 00:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
Thanks for letting me know about 'substitute'. It is technical, but I'll try to stick to this as it does make sense. Cheers
Riversider2008 (talk) 02:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy New Year![edit]
Season Greetings
Dear JetLover, on behalf of my snow-buried Canadian region of Ottawa, I would like to wish you a Safe and Happy New Year 2008.
JForget 02:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Supernatural[edit]
Yes. Lauren Cohan and Katie Cassidy joined the cast in Season 3. They are credited on-screen as stars. However, they only appear in about a third of the Season 3 episodes, so they aren't "Main Characters". Despite this, the writers/producers still list them as stars on the show. There was recently a big dispute about having them listed under the Series Leads section, but another anon IP refused to let them be there and vowed to keep reverting it, so I gave in to changing it to Main Characters and Supporting Characters on the page. However, they are still officially stars on the show. Ophois (talk) 04:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- 201.130.202.241 is back at it again. Can you please do something about him? Thanks. Ophois (talk) 01:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Since I've explained the situation, can you please revert your edit to 201.130.202.241's page removing the warnings? Thanks. Ophois (talk) 05:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay[edit]
Sounds right to me. By the way, Happy New Year.--Angel David (talk) 01:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome :)--Angel David (talk) 01:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
A Big Favor[edit]
I have aa big favor to ask of you: Could you co-mentor Angie with me? Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 02:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
That Wenonah Elementary article[edit]
Well...other than continuously being reverted and socks now appearing...it's utterly not notable...I'm going to take it to AfD. --SmashvilleBONK! 01:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I have given up on the article and it is yours to control. You could delete ok. Really. I give up. Sorry about wasting your time.
With all apologies,
5dsddddd (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I have posted on the Afd page in favor of deletion. 5dsddddd (talk) 01:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Sock Puppet[edit]
I 5dsddddd admit about the sock puppet and have reported myself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/5dsddddd
Pierzynski[edit]
Hello, thank you for the tips about the Brad Radke page. I do not understand your reasoning for talking away information from the A.J. Pierzynski page. Perhaps you could give me a detailed reason why it was not acceptable :) [[[User:Jlomcc2|Jlomcc2]] (talk) 06:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)]
He means don't add personal commentary to articles. Dude, I got in trouble for that last month. Tech43 (talk) 06:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
RfD nomination of "Dusty Wright"[edit]
I have nominated "Dusty Wright" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Floaterfluss (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I see you've given this user two vandalism warnings. Were these really warranted? Blackie Towery is the name of an actual basketball player ([2]), and Zighinkor is a real city in Senegal. ([3]). What exactly was the content of those two articles? From what I can tell from his other contributions, this user is acting in good faith. He's just inexperienced, and what looks like vandalism may simply be poorly executed edits. Zagalejo^^^ 04:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, right, they're just block warnings. I still think they're a bit heavy-handed, though. The topics of his articles are topics which are generally considered notable. I think it's best to guide and encourage a user like this, rather than simply block him. Zagalejo^^^ 04:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the Smile![edit]
I'm just happy to put my newfound rollback ability to use -- RC patrolling is so much more convenient now! :) Ashdog137 (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Untitled[edit]
sir i am sorry and i apolgize!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.42.164.49 (talk • contribs)
- It's OK. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Angel Locsin article[edit]
It looks like there was a lot of corruption by blocked users Aiza00 (talk · contribs) and Nass Gonzales (talk · contribs) and probably other pretty obvious sock puppets going back to at least 06:12, 28 December 2007. I reverted back to that version. I noticed that you have been watching and editing the article. I would appreciate it if you could double check to see if I either reverted back too far or not enough. I would also appreciate any insight into any other damage these editors might have done. Thanks. --NrDg 05:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I semi-protected it 2 weeks as per your suggestion. His last sock was created 1-Jan so he might have a few aged ones ready to go. Let me know if you see a new sock. --NrDg 05:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.[edit]
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Rollback[edit]
Hello JetLover, I've just granted you the rollback right, as I believe you are trustworthy with it. Your vandal-fighting has been effective in the past, and since you know the difference between a good-faith edit and vandalism, I don't believe you'll abuse or misuse rollback. If you don't want rollback, just let me know and I'll remove it. Thanks. Acalamari 22:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. :) I trust you to use it correctly. Good luck. :) Acalamari 22:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hope that's a preferable alternative. 217.43.192.75 (talk) 00:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Rudget![edit]
lay off, man[edit]
dude, will you just stay away from me? God. Blue Laser (talk) 18:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Fine, hows about you just stay out of our conversations and off my page. Ok? Blue Laser (talk) 01:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Until you can tell me of a chat site were i dont have to give them my e-mail adress or some crap like that, i'm staying. Blue Laser (talk) 01:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'll chat if I want.
- Yes, I will. Blue Laser (talk) 01:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Then tell me a site. Blue Laser (talk) 01:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC) (PS Your really starting to tick me off. The best thing to do would be to STAY OFF MY PAGE.)
- Yes, I will. Blue Laser (talk) 01:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'll chat if I want.
- Cuz it would make me leave, which is obviously what you want. Blue Laser (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- And i want to use it like a chat room. Blue Laser (talk) 01:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Your evil Blue Laser (talk) 01:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- You mean "you're evil". JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'd appreciate it if you'd leave me alone. Do you see how I roll? Blue Laser (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)