User talk:Jatin kamra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Khatri, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk ([[User you are providing wrong and fake information . Your information is propoganda against Khatri. I belong to Khatri community , you even know one person from Khatris community .I know thousands of Khatris community People, we are gone mail against you to Jimmy wales.

Wikipedia is not a blog where you can write your own stories. It depends on reliable source. Try to understand that and go through WP:RS. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk

I don't write that Information from Myself . I write those information from Reliable Sources. I know my community head and attend more than 100 metting by Khatri community all over India . Your Information is wrong , there are lot of fake Information and Article written by different people to detain Khatri community because of thier hate . You even know a real Indian History or Khatri History . You can't write anything you want . Wikipedia is not your personal Blog , you can write anything you want .I can't allow your fake information at any point .

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Khatri


Khatris original occupation are not silk waivers . Seventy Percent of Your Information is wrong . 

My information in list of Khatris and Khatris is 100 percent correct .

That article you mentioned is totally unsourced and 100% Unreliable her in Wikipedia. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your Information is wrong and it's gonna reverted or changed by as many account as you can think . I give your name and information in my community pages in social media .

Your Information didn't have appropriate source and they are not even near to reality . Your Information is propoganda of fake or Hate Articles in social media , books blogs by several unotorised Writers .

It's your duty to provide right information , just living in any other place , don't even know about one percent about community, you are writing just by your assumptions, Fake article , books and Information.

I challenge to give me one wrong Name in list of Khatris or wrong information in Khatri page edited by me .

How Khatris have highest number of Army , Navy and Air Chief in India.

Stop threatening me. You might get blocked for this. Behave politely and provide Reliable Source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not threatening you , I am requesting you to not promote fake and distorted information that's is far away from reality from distorted or Unauthorised resources according to Indian Government .

http://www.india-seminar.com/2004/534/534%20sanjay%20kumar.htm

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=9RzzxcEL4C0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q=khatris&f=false

https://rajeshkochhar.com/on-the-origin-of-the-punjabi-khatris/

I am using Single account , other account from anyone in the world from Khatri community .

Read Book Punjab Castes by Danzil , it's still written by British and provide some good information not all is correct but still much better than yours .

In India every community history and family history is recorded by Bhramins in Haridwar , there are seperate pandits for every gotra , Thier generations doing this work from generation and it's still recorded in books . In marriage in hindu community , the Bhramins speak thier vedic knowledge and they assign Khatris as kystriyas . Bhramins assigned Verna system in hindu communities in history .

Reference and your article about Khatri community not even matched 10 percent.

Khatris[edit]

I provide an Right Information , I belong to Khatri community . Jatin kamra (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete sourced info as you did and add all unsourced content. This is against Wikipedia policy. Consider it as a warning. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Khatri, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please , I request you stop promoting fake and racist information about particular community from distorted and Unauthorised sources , If you didnt stop providing fake information , your account will gonna reported .

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khatris . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jatin kamra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am just trying to correct information from valid sources mentioned in Wikipedia page . The source and Wikipedia article about Khatri community didn't match . Some of them have Unauthorised Sources . I am new at Wikipedia trying to correct information . I have now all the source through which I written the Information . http://www.india-seminar.com/2004/534/534%20sanjay%20kumar.htm https://books.google.co.in/books?id=9RzzxcEL4C0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q=khatris&f=false https://rajeshkochhar.com/on-the-origin-of-the-punjabi-khatris/ Sikhiwiki and Punjab Castes Book by Denzil . Jatin kamra (talk) 11:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for violating WP:EW but did not address this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed your request for proper display(you forgot closing brackets). 331dot (talk) 12:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jatin kamra, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please go further .

March 2019[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 16:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring, removing sourced information[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jatin kamra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have encounter an article that is absolutely wrong but clearly a work of art in terms of propaganda, the odds are very high that its the admins and arbiters and long term editors that have made it so. The main editor behind is Fylindfotberserk . Attempting to change such information will bring me into conflict with whichever adminaTROLL is responsible for maintaining that particular propaganda front. They are providing Fake and Wrong information about particular community with Unauthorised Sources . MY changes are quickly reverted, and I m blocked and come into immediate conflict with a Wikipedia community member, Now I am pretty clear that theres probably little chance of correcting the false information. The reverse is true, the CORE team is a bunch of propaganda warriors. If everyone just stopped trying to make wikipedia better and faced the reality that its inherently corrupt, Wikipedia would face death or correction of its sinister policies and its abusive behaviors;

Decline reason:

Requests that contain personal attacks and rants are not considered. To be unblocked, please address the reason for the block(in this case, edit warring). 331dot (talk) 08:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Verifiability matters; not truth and we are not permitted to indulge in any form(s) of original research (I would like to further suggest that the Sood of Punjab hills are the same people..... is not permitted by a mile or so) or synthesis (It is noteworthy that while the name Kamboja survives as a Punjab caste group, there is no preservation of Yavana in any contemporary caste or ethnic group. I would like to suggest that the Yavanas were absorbed by the Punjabi Kshatriya clans through intermarriage........ is reserved for your blog/academic dissertation).
You need to source each and every your changes to rigorously reliable sources (we don't use any Raj-era sources in this area or publications from relatively unknown houses) and I don't spot a single source in your write-up.
Also, bear in mind that personal attacks are strictly forbidden and your ability to edit this t/p will be revoked, shall you continue this rant rather than trying to identify the vast amount of problems with your editing/white-washing. WBGconverse 07:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir , I m strictly against any type of bashing against anyone . Even your source and Article didn't match. According to 99 percent mentioned source on Wikipedia Khatri page there occupation is Trading or Administrative but you have written silk waving . I request you to be unbaised and provide right information .

Variability matters but there are mentioned of numbers of Sources on page but the information provided is biased and incorrect even according to majority of that sources .

http://www.india-seminar.com/2004/534/534%20sanjay%20kumar.htm

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=9RzzxcEL4C0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q=khatris&f=false

https://rajeshkochhar.com/on-the-origin-of-the-punjabi-khatris/

Punjab Castes Book by Denzil .

Copyright problem on Khatri[edit]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Khatri, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Not to mention, the content in that site is user generated. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]