User talk:James nester

Welcome!

Hello, James nester, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kern precision scales, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kern precision scales[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kern precision scales requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Hello James nester. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kern precision scales, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New draft of Kern Precision Scales[edit]

I have looked at User:James nester/Kern Precision Scales, and I certainly think it gives enough of a claim of significance to avoid speedy deletion as an article "which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject", which is the reason it was deleted before. The article does look a little promotional in tone to me, but not enough to justify speedy deletion as spam, and i can't see any other speedy deletion criteria which could possibly apply, so it should be safe from speedy deletion. This does not prevent someone from nominating it for an articles for deletion discussion, but if that happens you will have a chance to argue your case for keeping it. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

James, thanks a lot, appreciate that. I will look at the tone. I'm not familiar with the process - do I just now put the article back myself? James nester (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can click on the "move" link at the top of the page, and in the box labelled "To new title" replace "User:James nester/Kern Precision Scales". Then the page will automatically be moved for you. If you can't see the "move" link then try pointing your mouse at the downward pointing triangle at the right hand end of the row of links. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kern precision scales for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kern precision scales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kern precision scales until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]