User talk:Jamberpilot

May 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Abortion in Ohio, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please discuss your changes on the talk page. This is a hot topic. Drmies (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Warning to stop your vandalism.

Stop your repeated removal of well-sourced content that is conducive to understanding the nature of these abortion laws, and stop asserting things which are false. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 07:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

You're not a mod. Stop posing as one and threatening other members of the community. I'm here to ensure that Ohio's information is readily available for others and that it is unbiased. I adjusted your words to reduce the bias, the citation is still there. You're repeatedly vandalizing it with very sharp assertions. The way information needs to be said is important. Words. There's a difference between "this IS the facts" and "this information is contested by other experts in the field." Jamberpilot (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

I am warning you again to stop. This page is cited: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/02/1033727679/fetal-heartbeat-isnt-a-medical-term-but-its-still-used-in-laws-on-abortion

Stop falsely accusing me of that which you yourself are guilty of. I will not allow you to remove scientifically accurate and needed information from pages that are meant to correctly inform and not mislead people. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)