User talk:JEDIMAN40

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to KETV has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 23:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page KETV. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 23:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to KETV. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 23:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to KETV. > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 23:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Truth needs to be verifiable to be on Wikipedia. This means you need a reliable source to information you publish, and you need to reach consensus to remove a verifiable statement. You have been removing or disrupting links to reliable sources without discussing if it is necessary, or providing a rationale to why you think such information sould be removed. That is why I have been reverting your edits. > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 23:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on KETV. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 00:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]