User talk:Irontitan76

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Irontitan76! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Fettlemap (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at JavaScript. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. More information below. bonadea contributions talk 13:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar edits[edit]

Irontitan76, it looks like you may be using a grammar checking tool to rapidly make language changes in Wikipedia articles. Unfortunately, grammar tools (such as Grammarly) can never be trusted, and when they suggest changes, each change has to be checked very carefully. Basically, these tools do three things:

1 identify correct language as incorrect, and suggest changes that add language errors
2 identify correct language as incorrect, and suggest changes that are also correct (but often worse than the existing text, even if they are formally correct)
3 identify incorrect language use, and suggest changes which may or may not be correct

Many (most?) edits using Grammarly will include all three types, although most will be either type 1 or type 2 above. For instance this edit: the comma after "eventually" is not incorrect, but nor is it incorrect to omit it; the hyphens in "open-source" can be included or omitted; the added "of" was incorrect because it changed the meaning of the sentence; Grammarly hates some expressions such as "on the basis of" which are completely fine to use (and sometimes much more correct than "based on"; the final "and" can formally be omitted, but including it is more clear. In the next edit here, the phrase "after which they are joined by commas" could absolutely not be changed to "after which commas joined them". There was no reason to change "which" to "that" here. The addded comma here should not be there. Here, you went through a Featured Article (one of the most thouroughly-checked articles in Wikipedia) and added a couple of errors, changed a spelling for no reason, and made some punctuation changes with had to be reverted. Here you added words inside a quotation. And so on. Please stop using Grammarly or whatever tool it is you are using – it is causing a lot of extra work for other editors. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 13:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]