User talk:Integrity2020

September 2020

Please do not add code to a Talk Page as you did to Talk:Sherin Ahmed. Just state what you want clearly. As per what the subject may or may not want on the page, it is |immaterial to Wikipedia. -- Alexf^(talk) 18:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Regarding adding code to talk page: I just copy pasted something from another wiki while I was almost a novice about wiki markup. I did not add any code knowingly or to violate anything. Just thought any clarification was needed for this. Ghazilenin (talk) 23:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ghazilenin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ghazilenin/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ghazilenin/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 14:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Ghazilenin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 14:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Sherin Ahmed. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, I have discussed the way I should make changes to the pages, at the Discord server's channel #english-wikipedia. I'll try to bring the topics here and make suggestions on what I feel need to be changed.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bazlur Rahman (soldier) (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bazlur Rahman (soldier) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bazlur Rahman (soldier), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zaglul Ahmed Chowdhury

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zaglul Ahmed Chowdhury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Zaglul Ahmed Chowdhury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaglul Ahmed Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaglul Ahmed Chowdhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Ghazilenin/sandbox

Hello, Ghazilenin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Constituency numbers and timeless prose

The relationship between Bangladeshi constituency numbers and constituency names is not stable. Although it is true that Bhola-3 was constituency 117 for the 9th, 10th, and 11th parliamentary elections, it was number 119 in the 8th parliamentary elections, and may be something else in the 12th. Academic and journalistic sources commonly use the constituency name alone. If they use the number at all, they do so only in combination with the name. The number is arbitrary, whereas the name conveys geographic information to the reader.

Wikipedians try to write in a way that requires a minimal amount of updating. One way to do that is to omit the constituency number. By doing so, if an incumbent is reelected, their biography doesn't need to be updated immediately, even if the constituency number has changed. The infobox of their article will still correctly say they are in office "– present". If you include the current constituency number, and that number changes, then the reelected MP's biography would have to be updated immediately to show their dates in "two" offices that are really just one. For example, if Bhola-3 becomes constituency 118 in 2023 parliamentary elections, and Nurunnabil Chowdhury wins reelection, their biography would have to be changed to show that they held the offices of "Member of Parliament for Constituency 117, Bhola-3" 2010-2023 and "Member of Parliament for Constituency 118, Bhola-3" 2023-present. That's why including the arbitrary constituency number is a bad idea.

Also, templates provide a number of aliases for the convenience of human editors, usually so they don't have to type as much, or don't have to remember which word is correct. In many cases automated bots and semi-automated tools then replace the aliases with the canonical word. Manually changing "language" to "lang" in citation templates, although it doesn't break how the page displays, is not productive for that reason. It will automatically be replaced by "language" again the next time one of those processes touches the article. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep these in mind. --Ghazilenin (talk) 15:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Majority parameter in Infobox officehold

In this edit, you added |majority = Bangladesh Awami League to the infobox of a Bangladeshi politician. That's not how the officeholder parameter is meant to be used. In this context, "majority" means the difference in the number of votes between the winner and whoever came second. In British politics, this is a closely tracked number (e.g. [1][2][3][4]). Although it could be calculated for Bangladeshi elections, reliable sources almost never do. I don't know why the measure never caught on in Bangladesh, perhaps it isn't as meaningful because of the country's rapidly growing population, multiple election boycotts, and irregular elections interspersed with military or caretaker rule. Whatever the reason, Wikipedia should follow reliable sources and omit "majority" from the infoboxes of Bangladeshi politicians. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:33, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing it out. I did not read the description for this param. I found the use like I was changing profiles to mark the majority party for the term of the person. But I also noticed this param does not have repeats like term. Some people also have multiple parties at different terms. I found wikipedia does not have party param repeatable too. Maybe because its not normal for most western country politicians to change party. --Ghazilenin (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Infobox officeholder has an "otherparty" parameter that can be used when a politician has changed parties. For a good example, see perhaps the most famous parliamentary case, Winston Churchill. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Ah thats nice! I thought that was for opposition party. I feel there need to have more elaborate explanations of each parameter and their possible usage. Not yet very well documented I must say.

I figured if 'parliament' param has a known combination Wiki hyperlinks the page automatically. Like for Bangladesh 'parliament' param has 'Jatiya Sangsad' as default value. And if one fills 'United Kingdom' it hyperlinks the UK parliament. This feature is not documented as I have found. Ghazilenin (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bazlur Rahman (freedom fighter)

Hello, Ghazilenin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bazlur Rahman (freedom fighter), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mustard cake

Hello, Ghazilenin,

Thank you for creating Mustard cake.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

some tone is also promotional

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett:

While browsing through my own language Wiki, I figured that this article is missing in English, which seemed awkward that the world doesn't yet know the organic fertilizer and its other benefits which we learnt from very early days. We used to bathe sometimes using the raw residues from cow pulled traditional mustard oil machines at our village. And we even fed our cattles by mixing some of it in every food they take.

When it comes to creating an Wiki article I cannot just say I know it. I'd have to cite the sources of my information. So I did Google a bit and added the information from there. But if they feel promotional I would of course try to eliminate such traits from the sentences. But I did add few videos so that people can get to know some of the uses of this material. Ghazilenin (talk) 04:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Jarred McGinnis

Hallo and thanks for starting this article about a very interesting writer. I was alerted to it because it linked to the article I created about the Barbellion Prize.

I see that you are not a particularly new editor, so please now try to remember a few of Wikipedia's standards:

• We don't refer to someone by their given name in the article but by their family name - so "McGinnis", not "Jarred"
• Section headings don't use capital letters except for the first letter and any proper nouns - so "External links" not "External Links"
• There is a particular order for sections, with References coming before External links (see WP:ORDER for the full list)
• We don't list social media accounts: just one official website as an External link. If there is no official website then one, only one, social media site such as LinkedIn or FaceBook may be added
• Please be careful about spelling, especially of unfamiliar names: you had the "Hey Festival" (Hay) and his publisher as "Gallery Beggar" (Galley)

I've spent quite a lot of time tidying up the article and it's in a better state now than it was an hour ago! Next time you create a new article, please take a little more care to follow the WP:MOS and get it right first time. Thanks. PamD 16:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out all the mistakes, taking your time. I'll keep them in mind for next works. Ghazilenin (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hajera Mahtab moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hajera Mahtab, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Syed Sohel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Syed Sohel. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 22:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syed Sohel (May 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by JJPMaster was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

JJP_Master (she/they) 03:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)