User talk:Inicholson

Welcome[edit]

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Inicholson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DRN filing[edit]

Just letting you know that I closed your DRN request to have you go back and list additional participants, but then reopened it after I realized that it was not about the section in general but only the section header, a dispute only currently involving the two of you. I'm saying this because I didn't want you to see the closure and think that the listing is gone: it was gone for a couple of minutes, but now it's back. I've notified the other editor of the filing. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer) (Not watching)[reply]

SAE[edit]

You mention about having a SAE section heading. I have something similar. There is an article, The Sound of Music (film). Two editors seem to own the article. They seem to want to hide that the film had a hard time finding a director. If you have any opinion, you can express them on that talk page. If not, ok.

One famous director chased the screenwriter out of his house saying "Go find someone else to direct this shit". Burt Lancaster remarked "Jesus, you must need the money!" Other directors seemed to have just declined. If this amount of detail is reported, you can be sure it is noteworthy. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 17:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DRN[edit]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject templates[edit]

Did you mean to put those on the article page? I believe they are intended for the Talk page. Artw (talk) 23:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good call on the Turner case[edit]

Should have seen that. It was all primary source, which is not acceptable in BLP with this level of controversy. Grammar's Li'l Helper ^Talk 00:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's knowing when you are right and doing it boldly. Grammar's Li'l Helper ^Talk 00:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the People v. Turner page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vox Day[edit]

Please join the discussion on neutrality of POV on the Vox Day talk page. Thank you. Pkeets (talk) 03:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]