User talk:Infobox5
Welcome Infobox5!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Your post on the New Page Patrol noticeboard[edit]
Hi Infobox5. You posted this on the new page patrol noticeboard, but I'm not sure why. Are you asking for help?- MrX 18:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi!I need to patrol this page, how to do it?Thank you!
- You don't. A user shouldn't patrol pages they created. Moreover, you need to have permission to patrol any page at all. I'll take a look at that page though. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you!
- I've gone ahead and patrolled it, and noted a few issues with it. One problem is that you are using the Russian Wikipedia as a source. You shouldn't do that. Wikipedia is not a reliable source, because it is user generated content. You also use the same reference multiple times, but you provide a new citation each time. It makes it easier on readers if you name your citations and then call back to them if you want to use them again. You can do that by putting <ref name="NAME OF REFERENCE"> instead of just <ref>, and then for the second or third time you use that source you would put <ref name="NAME OF REFERENCE" /> and it would link them. Let me know if you have any questions. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 19:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Rudolf Schumann for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rudolf Schumann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolf Schumann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Infobox5, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Infobox5! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC) |
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much!Infobox5 (talk) 08:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
June 2017[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolf Schumann. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 07:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you!Infobox5 (talk) 07:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Ehm... Oops?[edit]
I guess this didn't work as planned? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 14:24, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello!I need to translate the text, work on articles, You can translate the text?Infobox5 (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'm limited by a white-list so I can't even GET to the "simple-English" Wikipedia if I wanted to... Sorry! Oxygene7-13 (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
You can create an article in the English Wikipedia, copy the text of simple Wikipedia and move to the English Wikipedia?Thank You Very Much!Infobox5 (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- My initial question actually was though, what went wrong when you posted you're question on my talkpage and immediately removed it again? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
I thought you were busy and you have no time to translate the articleInfobox5 (talk) 17:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Well, considering the fact that I'm Dutch and limited by a white-list, I might not be the right person to ask, sorry.
- I hope you find the right guy, I'd say: try Wikipedia:Help desk! Oxygene7-13 (talk) 10:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for help and answers to my questions!)Infobox5 (talk) 10:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Uncle Roy, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Uncle Roy (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank You!)Infobox5 (talk) 14:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A request has been filed for the title of Rudolf Schumann (composer) requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.
If you feel that the topic of the article meets our notability guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.
Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and grounds for a block. Thank you. Uncle Roy (talk) 06:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rudolf Schumann (composer)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rudolf Schumann (composer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Uncle Roy (talk) 06:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shumann Rudolf[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shumann Rudolf, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 14:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2019[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Shumann Rudolf, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Praxidicae (talk) 14:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Infobox5: What part of these many warnings are unclear? You were warned in 2017 for this same behavior, I suggest you stop as you're going to wind up indefinitely blocked. Praxidicae (talk) 14:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Shumann Rudolf for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shumann Rudolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shumann Rudolf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:48, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2019[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TNT 💖 15:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)