User talk:Infectious Trauma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hey, Infectious Trauma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like the site and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful (some of them may sound stupid, but I recommend you check them out):

While editing, please remember:

You should introduce yourself here at the new user log. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name, the date, and the time.

For your first edits, I suggest searching for articles that you think might interest you. You could also be audacious and try a random page.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and happy editing! Cbrown1023 01:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status[edit]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Infectious Trauma, I don't know if your reusing my exact multiple references (8 of them) and information (even with the same dates the articles were Retrieved) that I first used for the page Running Man Brothers qualifies exactly as Wikipedia:Spam or not, but maybe you can ask other Administrators if it does. I carefully added the Running Man Brothers information to Haha's page with 2 different references, in order to avoid the appearance of spamming. Both pages for Haha and Kim Jong-kook have links to the Running Man Brothers page and there is not a need to repeat the exact information on their pages, this is redundant. I will attempt to Revert your edits, as I see a Bot had to correct the references that you "borrowed" from Running Man Brothers, that were not entered correctly. If you want to discuss this, and attempt to add new information to any of these pages, please do so in a manner that does not borrow references that you did not generate yourself, and which may jeopardize all 3 pages, which may be monitored for Spamming. Thanks.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 16:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 06:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]