User talk:Infactinteresting

Welcome![edit]

Hi Infactinteresting! I noticed your contributions to Gloucester, Massachusetts and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 08:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Aloha27[edit]

Hello, Infactinteresting. You have new messages at Aloha27's talk page.
Message added 18:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thank you for your input. I believe that I can with certainly put a recent death tag on the article seeing as there have been over hundred edits in the past 24 hours. I've only been involved in this project for over 15 years. Regards. Aloha27 talk 18:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No need to put the names of non-notable children in a biography. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Location?[edit]

This edit for Clayton, New Jersey and other such edits have the edit summary "location". What is being changed? Alansohn (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do your own research[edit]

I’m not responsible for doing your research or cleaning up your messes. 217.88.33.149 (talk) 09:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Gaia Octavia Agrippa. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Paul Sorvino. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 23:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Linking countries[edit]

Please do not link familiar subjects, especially countries with familiarity. We are trying to avoid certain links as per WP:OVERLINK. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:43, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks in lists[edit]

As already requested (twice) please can you take a look at WP:REDLINK and WP:WRITEITFIRST which explains why we do not use redlinks in lists. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 10:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Infactinteresting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel you are wrong

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 13:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not sure why you think you are right blocking. When I show you that you are wrong, will you apologize?Infactinteresting (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That explains it, you're a "deletionist". Well, I wish you weren't here.Infactinteresting (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing an ANI notice? Which isn't valid? Infactinteresting (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you (jpgordon et al.) never remove blocks, won't bother appealing. This is wacko. Infactinteresting (talk) 13:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remove a notice? Who are you, people? Infactinteresting (talk) 13:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John, care to reply? Infactinteresting (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to remove notices, with the understanding that in doing so, you are acknowledging them. However you are not free to ignore serious concerns raised regarding your editing practices by other editors, while continuing the same problematic behavior. This is a collaborative project and communication in some situations is not optional. Nor do you get to decide unilaterally that you are right and everyone else is wrong in disagreements regarding your editing. Your pattern of editing in combination with your refusal to engage with other editors who have raised issues on that subject, plus your comments above since being blocked are a source of grave concern to me. Frankly, I am not altogether sure you are temperamentally well suited to a project that requires some level of engagement and respect for the broader community's consensus on editing practices. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]