User talk:Indiancj

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Indiancj! Thank you for your contributions. I am Neelkamala and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Neelkamala (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Chamar

We had a discussion about primary sources at Talk:Chamar earlier this year. There are also discussions at WP:AFD, WP:ANI, List of Other Backward Classes and various other forums. In addition, there is WP:PRIMARY. Please don't tell me that my reverts of your contributions are just my "personal view". Instead, re-read what was said at the article talk page and continue the discussion there as per WP:BRD. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

We had a discussion but you wrongly assumed too many things. You have a lot of contribution to wiki and that is very appreciable. Well wikipedia is a source of information. Your wisdom speak a lot when you use "Please don't tell me". Please make some sense rather than showing arrogance. You also need to go through the Wiki guidelines and understanding those guidelines properly before showing others. Memorizing something doesn't prove that you have understood too. Believe me there is a difference. Friend, if you are contributing a lot that doesn't prove you are the only most intelligent person in this world and you can have authority over single information. You take your contributions as an ego factor and when you feel that you are lacking evidence to support you then you tend to remove the article by using word "Unreliable". There is a way of putting things. You do wonderful job and keep doing that but please be flexible in approach. You are a great contributor and I respect that fact. –Indiancj (talk) 17:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Citing

You need to source this. Please see WP:Citing sources and give me a yell if you get stuck - there are plenty of examples in the article already, so hopefully you'll figure it out. I could do it for you but then you'll learn nothing and citations are at the very heart of how we do things here ;) - Sitush (talk) 17:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

I will do that. Thanks for reminder. Yup! I am learning more and more about Wikipedia :-). But do not get much time for this. :-/

Thanks for having a go, and you were not too far off the mark. It should be {{cite book |title=Studies In Indian History: Rajasthan Through The Ages |volume=3: The Heritage Of Rajputs |first1=R. K. |last1=Gupta |first2=S. R. |last2=Bakshi |publisher=Sarup & Sons |year=2008 |isbn=81-7625-841-5 |url=http://books.google.co.in/books?id=eKGhCWZs59oC&pg=PA65 |page=65}} There are a whole load of cite templates listed at User:Sitush - some people copy them to their own user pages as a reminder. The version ~I give above will produce the result shown below. - Sitush (talk) 16:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

References

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! Indiancj, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Caste sources

Hi, we do not use British Raj era sources, or even older ones, in caste articles etc. There is a long-standing consensus regarding this and it is why I have reverted you at Kori caste. They are not considered to be reliable and we do not record what unreliable sources say. - Sitush (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Kori caste shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Sanctions alert

Aside from the above note regarding our three-revert rule, please also familiarise yourself with the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 17:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Proposed deletion of Banke Chamar

The article Banke Chamar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NOTABLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerus (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)