User talk:ISoham

Welcome!

Hello, ISoham, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 18:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks — isoham (talk) 18:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ambala district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Charaka[edit]

Hi, I see you're doing some editing to this article - good luck with it. What it mainly needs is some references for the many claims made. There should be a list of Charaka's works, and as importantly a list of books, reliable papers etc about him, cited in the text. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:45, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Muhammad Iqbal. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 08:56, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Smsarmad. I'm not sure you've gone through the page history. If you'd have, you'd know better.

Foremost, You'd know that there is no edit war on the page, outrightly rendering your post redundant!!!!!!
You'd know that it's because I have already created a link to the talk page Talk:Muhammad Iqbal which you've asked me to do herein, since you have no idea that it's already done!!!
You'd know that only edit that I have made is tagging the article for lack of WP:RS and pushing WP:POV. Despite counterfactual information, I have not removed anything!!!
You'd know that let apart, reverting thrice in a day, I have reverted only once
You'd know that User: Darkness Shines has reverted my summarised edits more than once without reason
You'd know to issue the edit warring warning to User: Darkness Shines instead
You'd know that the section I have tagged is violating a consensus that had earlier been reached on that page

But, then you don't seem to know any of it! One infers, it is because you want to impose your POV and WP:OR on editors

Also.

It is you have have been recently threatened with a block for disrupting
If you think that you can overwhelm an editor by posting falsehood, you should think again
So, please stop posting funny posts and instead focus and not getting blocked yourself for pushing WP:POV and disregarding consensus

isoham (talk) 10:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ISoham, my above message is a pre-written template message to inform new editors about Wikipedia's Edit Warring policy. Having an on going discussion on the talk page doesn't mean you can continue reverting or your edits won't be counted as reverts, that means that even if you are discussing the issue at the talk page while reverting repeatedly you are still edit warring. Your first edit was adding a dubious/disputed tag to a section while your second and third edits are reverts, if you have any doubt you can ask any experience editor. The three revert rule is just a bright line that clearly puts you on the other side and reverting thrice in a day is not your right. One can get blocked even if he/she hasn't broken the 3RR rule and has done only one revert a day. Darkness Shines is already well aware of the Edit warring policy and the 3RR rule and he can get reported or blocked without a prior recent warning, so I don't need to leave him a similar message.

I see you wasted a lot of your time researching on me but you failed to see that almost every editor who gave me a warning recently currently stands blocked (I don't mean to imply here that they got blocked for those warnings but actually they themselves were disruptive). I would suggest you to please calm down and don't take an editing dispute so seriously. Happy Editing! -- SMS ^Talk 11:58, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Smsarmad. Thanks for writing. I know that having discussion doesn't mean edits are not counted, and that 3RR rule is only an upper limit. And I don't think my third edit counts towards 3RR. Notwithstanding any of it, the point is I'm in discussion mode, and only arguing against editors violating Wikipedia:Consensus. Besides, it doesn't required an aeon, just a peek instead, at your page to decipher warnings. Cheers. isoham (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kambar (poet) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghaziabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brahmaputra River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Putra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for List of English words of Tamil origin [edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of English words of Tamil origin , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Himalayan Expressway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* For better monitoring of mishaps, it is fitted with video incident detection system (VIDS.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Audio recordings[edit]

I just realized there are some Hindustani examples in phone (vowel or consonant sound) pages, which should be recorded: for instance, the word दो or دو in Close-mid back rounded vowel § Occurrence. Perhaps you could make some of these recordings. However, I should mention that AmritasyaPutra has good recording equipment. You can hear his (or her?) recordings in Hindustani phonology § Consonants. If you don't have quite as good equipment, perhaps it would be better if he did the recordings. Let me know. — Eru·tuon 20:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Erutuon: I've added the Hindi audio. Also added Punjabi audio.

Also, I noticed the Bilabial stops audio on Hindustani phonology#Consonants is incorrect. फाल (phāl) has been recorded as a labial unvoiced fricative. It violates Hindi phonology according to which it should be a bilabial unvoiced plosive stop consonant like in the following four examples. This would need correction, but I can't figure out a series of four words to illustrate. — isoham (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed that ph was being pronounced as f. I didn't make a note to AmritasyaPutra, though probably should have. Another user has has commented on that pronunciation on AmritasyaPutra's talk page, and I will post my response there. — Eru·tuon 17:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The vowel articles that have Hindi-Urdu examples are [i], [ɪ], [e], [ɛ], [ə], [æ], [ä], [ɔ], [ʊ], [u]. Consonant articles: [p], [b], [f], [v], [ʋ], [t̪], [d̪], [s], [z], [ɾ], [l], [ɳ], [ʈ], [ɖ], [ɽ], [tʃ], [dʒ], [ʃ], [j], [k], [g], [x], [ɣ], [w], [q], [ɦ]. If you find that one of these articles lacks an example from Hindi-Urdu, we need to add one. — Eru·tuon 17:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, ISoham. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ISoham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ISoham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Delhi Temple attack[edit]

Please discuss your desired changes on the Talk page, per WP:BRD. Schazjmd (talk) 16:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Check and comment. Do not delete cited references. isoham (talk) 17:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ISoham, you have not made any comments on the talk page. Schazjmd (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did now. Had made only at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Delhi Temple attack. Copied them to article talk page isoham (talk) 17:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan discretionary sanctions[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. The specific comment was:- Use of sockpuppets by radical islamic elements..... ∯WBG^converse 14:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Made no WP:NPA. Sockpuppets are, by definition, not specific editors. The very reason they exist is disruption. Since you've found time commenting on my page, would help if you produce evidence of personal attacks. I standby facts. So, Stop WP:HARASS. Stop WP:HUSH; any further WP:HUSH false or questionable "warnings" on the page shall, thus, be removed. - isoham (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hinduism[edit]

WikiProject Hinduism

Hello, ISoham. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!

Subscribe

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on Delhi 2020 riots[edit]

I suggest you remove it immediately. Note that you can be blocked for threatening legal action, even if you're doing so indirectly. --RegentsPark (comment) 00:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read wp:legal.Slatersteven (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]