User talk:Hopscotch27

This is Hopscotch27's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Concern regarding Draft:Andy Stewart (Horse Racing)[edit]

Hello, Hopscotch27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andy Stewart (Horse Racing), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lindsey Stirling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grimes. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andy Stewart (Horse Racing)[edit]

Hello, Hopscotch27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andy Stewart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lindsey Stirling Summer Tour for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lindsey Stirling Summer Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsey Stirling Summer Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lindsey Stirling Summer Tour Dates 2016.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lindsey Stirling Summer Tour Dates 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gezim Pepsi[edit]

Hello, Hopscotch27,

Thank you for creating Gezim Pepsi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: Absolutely happy to explore finding additional references. However, what I would like to understand - as I had another page removed before as it was not referenced sufficiently, is can you explain how the following pages of players representing the same club are happily sitting without removal? Examples include: Nico Hug, Gabriel Lüchinger - both have 1 reference which is Soccerway.

I will try to secure more references, I understand "notability guidelines" - all I was attempting to do was curate information for players, in the same way as had been done already.

Thanks in advance for your help, I just want to understand better with regards creating a page and why I have had a few instances of my work being removed despite significant time being put into creating these for information.

Hopscotch27 (talk) 07:50, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I meant representing another club in the Swiss league, apologies. However, I would cite Florian Baak as another example? Hopscotch27 (talk) 07:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hopscotch27 I confess I am not responsible for what other New Page Patrollers do - nor do I defend such practices. The examples you give are examples of indelicate reviewing. I did go through all the references in the article. Yes, this fellow exists. Yes, this fellow plays football. However, I did not read any significant coverage of this player. This is the principal and only reason why the article was tagged. I would like to suggest you take a read of WP:NSPORTS2022 proposal 5 as summarised by Wugapodes. It's what we work on. Find ONE good reference with significant coverage, and you're on your way. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted 2022 Sport Individual/Team/Event requirement of notability.

Hopscotch27 (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Francome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadcaster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clivio Piccione, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fontvieille.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Hopscotch27. Thank you for creating 1981 British Formula Three Championship. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. I noticed a few seasons were missing, so will try to add them when I get time & find accurate sources of information. Hopscotch27 (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 Austrian Supercup (September 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references listed here are only match statistics, nothing that is WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2004 Austrian Supercup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding to my draft and I understand that due to sources it is not going to be accepted. However, I would like to know how this page about the same subject in 1988 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988_Austrian_Supercup- is acceptable despite it sourcing no references at all?

I don't mind the non-acceptance, I just like to understand when I want to increase the articles and knowledge.

Thanks,

Hopscotch27 (talk) 20:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hopscotch27! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2004 Austrian Supercup[edit]

Hello, Hopscotch27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2004 Austrian Supercup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2004 Austrian Supercup[edit]

Hello, Hopscotch27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2004 Austrian Supercup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bell Bank Park Logo 2022.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bell Bank Park Logo 2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fallowfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page England national team.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]