User talk:HistoryQueen5

Links to draft articles[edit]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at University of Toronto, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please don't add link to draft articles until the articles themselves are ready. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inez Elliston (April 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Five of the eight footnotes are primary or unreliable sources that are not support for notability, and what's left for proper media coverage (two Toronto Star articles and a Who's Who book) isn't enough to claim that she would pass WP:GNG if that's all she has for proper media coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inez Elliston and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HistoryQueen5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]