User talk:Hinto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome from Redwolf24[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 12 May 2024 T 02:14 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your contributions to some Hong Kong-related articles. You might be interested to take a look at HK wikipedians' notice board, HK Collaboration of the Week and Current events in Hong Kong and Macao. Happy editing! — Instantnood 06:35, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

Television broadcasting[edit]

Since you say that one of your interests is television broadcasting, if it isn't too much trouble for you could you look through some of the recent edits for Ronald20 (talk · contribs). The user has been doing a few good edits (as far as I can tell), plus a bunch of nonsense edits (which I and others have been reverting). (Also: Thanks for fixing the tables at Eyewitness News—I know just enough about tables and CSS to be very dangerous.) BlankVerse 08:20, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've checked out Ronald20. Thank you. I've left a couple of notes at Vandalism in progress, including noting an IP that I think he is also using, but there seems to be no response from the admins there. I think I may end up having to ask a favor of one of the admins that I know to try and get Ronald20 blocked for awhile. It's such a waste of time doing all those reverts of nonsense. BlankVerse 13:50, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, glad to help. I'd like to see him get blocked too; it's really annoying to have to pick up after him. - Hinto 16:29, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you are also cleaning up TV articles where an anon user is dumping a huge amount of background information for the station. I am also in the process of cleaning up such articles and would like to know what is the extent of these edits from your perspective. Thanks. Pentawing 20:55, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That guy knows a lot about MANY stations, so it's kind of hard to track down his edits. But I'd begin with stations that were affected (even remotely) by the New World Communications, Westinghouse and Savvoy-Fox affiliation switches of the mid-1990s (eg. those in Atlanta, Birmingham and Dallas). He also seems very interested with stations that were formerly independent (eg. KSTW, KCPQ).
I think I've also tracked down several IPs that he uses, so of course it'd be easier to do it that way. But I don't know if it's appropriate to list them here. Hope I answered your question. :) - Hinto 23:30, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...please don't file templates in article categories; it causes the articles that the template is on to be filed in the category as well. Mostly it's not a big deal, because the articles are already in the same category, but it is a problem when you get to KVOS, which doesn't belong in Category:Television stations in British Columbia. (Similarly, the Detroit TV template was once filed in Category:Television stations in Detroit and Category:Television stations in Canada; this caused all the Detroit stations to appear in the Canadian category.) I know other people do it, but it should actually be undone when you see it, rather than imitated. Bearcat 20:07, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. (The case with KVOS completely escaped me.) - Hinto 23:30, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up some of the wording in the article and applying the Knight Ridder template. Sometimes when you write an article from scratch you smooth-over the grammar in your head as you think about what to add. Also, I didn't know about the KR template, so it was very helpful. Rkevins82 01:21, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, glad to help. I only found out about the KR template today anyway. :P - Hinto 01:36, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are two things that can be done:

  • Create a new article entitled with the station's call letters and redirect.
  • Create a new article as above but put up Channel 61 for deletion.

In my opinion, I don't think this article can be made as a disambig. Pentawing 21:46, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Network sorting[edit]

The reason I'm sorting these is because I think of sorting by W or K is like sorting a group of books beginning with "the" by the letter "T." Every book would begin with the same letter, just as every station in this case begins with "K" or "W." Some stations were already sorted this way in the regional categories, so I don't see why the national category can't be different. --/ɛvɪs/ /tɑːk/ /kɑntɹɪbjuʃ(ə)nz/ 01:10, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Wikimania 2006[edit]

In the course of informal discussions at Wikimania in Frankfurt the possibility of having Wikimania 2006 in Vancouver was raised. What makes Canada desirable for such a meeting is the capacity to draw delegates from the United States. For many overseas delegates, however, U.S. visa requirements make that country less attractive. All else being equal, Europeans see Vancouver as a more interesting Canadian city to visit than Toronto, the only other Canadian city to receive significant consideration.

Preliminary bids from various cities need to be made by Sept. 30, 2005. A short list will be drawn from those bids. Is there enough interest and energy to put together such a conference in Vancouver for August 2006? The people in Frankfurt put on a tremendous gathering, with a core organizational group of about a dozen people. Some 400 people attended from 52 different countries.

I expect that a North American Wikimania could be a little smaller, but we would still need a suitable facility. It would be good to know that such a facility is available for a conference; the type of youth hostel facility that was used in Frankfurt does not exist in North America. What would be the cost of hosting such a conference at UBC?

I'm looking for interest and commitment. To that end I am proposing a Vancouver meetup for Saturday, Sept. 24. If someone has a reasonably accesible place for such a meeting please let me know. (I live in Richmond, but something in the city of Vancouver would be more appropriate.)

I am spammiong this to all Vancouver area Wikipedians that I can find. Please reply to my talk page. Eclecticology 21:50:16, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

New York City Radio Stations[edit]

I wanted to ask if you could clean up the articles on most commercial New York City radio stations. I know that radio stations aren't really your forte, but these articles were apparently done by the same anon user that does many tv stations. And after seeing the good cleanup work that you've done on these tv stations, I was wondering if you could do the same for these radio stations. It should be noted that some stations have already been cleaned up to varying degrees, so you should check the history of these pages if you choose to edit. ErikNY 03:06, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for catching my dyslexia on WLKY.  ;-) Transposition is often my downfall. -Roby Wayne Talk • Hist 03:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]


User Categorization[edit]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Canada page as living in or being associated with Canada. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in British Columbia for instructions. --Doviende 19:39, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AOL Broadcast Fan[edit]

I've seen your edits to the problem user's edits on tv stations pages, and you've done a great job. I set up a page Here to describe, discuss and report the severity of the user. If you have anything to report relating to him, post it here. ErikNY 19:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing my dumb mistakes[edit]

I thought I double-checked the VHF/UHF on KWBQ and KASA. Thanks for catching my dumb mistakes. -Oddtoddnm 05:11, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Hong Kong COA[edit]

It at least needs to be moved to Coat of Arms of Hong Kong to match every other state. But I havo no idea if it's emblem or coa. You could check Category:National coats of arms to get an idea of what people are doing with it. Renata3 23:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver City Hall[edit]

Thanks for cleaning up my mess at the Vancouver City Hall article. It needed it. I just wanted to throw some usefull information on there because when I first found the article it stated that "A statute of George Washington by Charles Marega is in front of the building." Zhatt 04:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your nice editings! but do you think it'd be better to spread the pics into different sections? --K.C. Tang 02:56, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

O, i guess it's about the font size: the pics should look ok if the front size is set as "larger". anyway, thanks for your kind reply!--K.C. Tang 03:34, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TV Market[edit]

Hi, I have noticed that in the past you have edited or created a template for a television DMA (market) in North America, or have edited an articles about television stations. Currently their are several different styles of the template being used. Because of this i have set up a workshop to obtain input on setting up a common configuration for these templates. Feel free to assist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television Stations/markets. Also while you are their, feel free to leave you name as a participant on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Television Stations as well as any comments you might have, to help wikipedia improve articles on television stations. If you know some one else who has helped contribute to these templates or you think would like to help, please pass this mesage on to them.--Boothy443 | trácht ar 06:42, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

KTVX[edit]

You have received this message because you have edited a Salt Lake City media article in the past. We have recently had an edit war regarding the wording and inclusion of a paragraph on the KTVX article. In hopes of resolving this I have put together an informal survey. If you are interested, please stop by Talk:KTVX and add a vote. Thanks, A 09:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Des Voeux Road[edit]

I noticed your recent rearrangements to the Des Voeux Road article [1]. The previous arrangement actually reflects they're three roads sharing part of their names, and that was the recent why materials on transport and history spanned across the three sections. After your edit the original arrangement was lost. I'm curious to know why would you think it's better to present transport and history of the different roads in the same section, separated from their own sections. Thanks. — Instantnood 18:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've slightly modified the article, please take a look. [2]Instantnood 21:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much. — Instantnood 18:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aberdeen Centre[edit]

Hi, I saw that you re-arranged the photos on the Aberdeen Centre page. I dunno about your browser, but the image re-positioning makes the Edit buttons mess up in Firefox. Does it mess up for your browser too? Also, I personally feel that having too many images together like that makes it look a little messy (although the pics can't be spread out much due to the article's size). Just my two cents. :) --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 01:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Why was Roger Grimsby fired from ABC?--JohnFlaherty 04:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Sea Island[edit]

Thanks for the copy edit. Mechanics were never my strong suit, and I've always been a rough draft kind of guy. TKE 05:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I truely appreciate that, because after a year of reading that's my first pretty much creation. TKE 06:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Establishment of The Wikimedia Hong Kong[edit]

TV Market Templates[edit]

They serve Van-Vic as they are on cable I think CoolKatt number 99999 20:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We are having a discussion on out-of-market stations in these templates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations. I agree with you with regards to the Seattle stations btw. Kirjtc2 20:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Cove[edit]

Hello... noticed that you've moved the Deep Cove article. I've restored it to the original name pending discussion. The rationale being, the original title is more accurate and helps to avoid perpetuating the misconception that Deep Cove is a separate entity from the District of North Vancouver. (Also, I've come across a number of references to different "Deep Coves" in WikiPedia, and it's only a matter of time before they get Wiki'd.) Let's discuss, though - perhaps a more appropriate title would be Deep Cove (North Vancouver). --Ckatz 05:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

U of T[edit]

Hi. How's life at U of T? I'm starting there in a couple of weeks. What year are you? 1st? Orane (talkcont.) 02:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong[edit]

Hey Hinto,

What a coincidence! I live in Hong Kong for more than 2 decades, but I moved to Canada!

The Geography Expert--Glad to serve youChat or discuss something with meWhat I give This signature proofs that this discussion/article/section is official! 01:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to join in our WikiProject? Click Wikipedia:WikiProject Golden Horseshoe Roads

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wgcl.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wgcl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hinto,

I have recently request to rename the category you had created earlier to Category:Roads in Toronto, in order to match back other styles used when roads are divided into municipalities (such as Category:Roads in York Region and Category:Roads in Simcoe County, et cetera)

Thank you, and happy editing

Smcafirst or NickSign HereChit-ChatContribs at 02:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl River Delta[edit]

Hi, in this edit to Pearl River Delta, you correctly removed a bunch of Chinese place names from the article. As shown in the first line of the diff, though, you also changed part of the IPA pronunciation code for the name from tɕy55 to tsy55. Was this intentional, or a typo?--Srleffler 23:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wbns-ewn-open.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wbns-ewn-open.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ftv-luk1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ftv-luk1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citytv[edit]

Thanks for your support for my changes at Citytv and elsewhere. I am trying to avoid an edit war by starting a discuss at Talk:Citytv. Your comments would be appreciated. Ground Zero | t 17:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wxia-11alive.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wxia-11alive.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ViperSnake151 01:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(translation: Sorry to say this, but I finally found a better quality version of the logo for WXIA-TV, bask in it's awesomeness! ViperSnake151 01:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wxia-11alive.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wxia-11alive.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kxas-logo2.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kxas-logo2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply regarding CIVT-TV[edit]

Alright. i understand why the image will be deleted, but i just don't think it should be, since it was used on a major TV source (nelsonmedia.ca). I was a bit annoyed earlier, sorry. I also need civility lessons. x.x RingtailedFoxTalkStalk 20:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wghplogo sm.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wghplogo sm.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wghplogo sm.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wghplogo sm.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. WCQuidditch 20:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2009[edit]

Toronto Candidate City for Wikimania 2009
Support TORONTO in its bid to become the host city of WIKIMANIA 2009
The University of Toronto is the planned host site, which I see is where you're studying!

Visit m:Wikimania 2009/Toronto for TORONTO's MetaWiki page and help build a strong bid.

-- Zanimum 16:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Remembrance...[edit]

Rememberance Day


--nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 23:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CNBC-ticker-2006.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CNBC-ticker-2006.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 18:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bentall Centre[edit]

I am curious. You moved Bentall Centre (Vancouver) over a redirect to the shopping centre in the UK which shares the same name, without any discussion whatsoever. Your reason was that it was more notable. Enlighten me: without any discussion whatsoever, how did you determine that this was the general concencus? What reasons do you have for suggesting it's more notable? TheIslander 23:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't particularly object to the move. After leaving the note above, I did a bit of Googling myself, and as you point out the centre in Vancouver returns more hits than that in Kingston. My initial reaction was because, in the UK, I'd definitely give the Bentall Centre in Kingston greater notability, but I wasn't particularly aware of the notability of the Vancouver centre outside the UK. The only thing I object to really is the fact that it was done so quickly - even leaving a quick note on the talk page a day before moving it would have been better, as it would have given some indication as to your intent. Also, had it been me, I'd have placed the dab notice on the Vancouver article immediately, so as not to give the impression of elevating the status of the Vancouver centre above that of the Kingston centre. Still, not many editors would have responded to my message above in such a detailed and polite manner, so I thank you for that ;). TheIslander 00:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KTSF.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KTSF.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help, please[edit]

Hello, Hinto! Sorry, I bother you :). I'm writing an article about M. McLuhan in russian wiki, wanting some images. Can you move your Image:Marshall_McLuhan_Way_Toronto.jpg to Wiki.Commons? Thanks a lot... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.bykov (talkcontribs) 10:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ewn-kiro-1998.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ewn-kiro-1998.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A-Channel[edit]

Sorry...I thought that's who put it there in the first place. Bearcat (talk) 01:12, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just getting so frakkin' frustrated with 99/Dongwong that I'm getting a bit hot under the collar without thinking first, I think... Bearcat (talk) 01:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While we're on the subject, should we maybe think about either editblocking 99, or temporarily page-protecting the articles, this weekend so they can't interrupt while the necessary A-Channel → A changes get made by people like you who do know what they're doing? Bearcat (talk) 01:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A - News. Aaaargh. Bearcat (talk) 02:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KERO-TV[edit]

I saw what you meant about Lloyd Lindsay Young and thought a lot of that didn't really talk about KERO, so took out what didn't need to be talked about to make it better. Hopefully like that. I left everything in there about Rusty Shoop because that I know is true. I figured your opinion was good, or liked your opinion and don't want readers to be bored reading about everything. Glad you like it now. Thanks for pointing out some of the stuff to make the KERO-TV page better for the readers to read about KERO-TV. Makes me feel good to make someone happy with the changes I've made.--JoeCool950 (talk) 07:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:BC Highway 7[edit]

See here. It states Highway 7 starts 300 m west of Coleman Avenue and ends 300m west of United Boulevard. Then begins 95 m east of Ottawa Street until the interchange with Highway 1 in Hope.  єmarsee Speak up! 23:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TVYVR[edit]

With the death of Geocities coming soon, do you plan on moving your historical clips on Vancouver television to another host or to Youtube? It would be a shame if these clips weren't moved to another site. Thanks.  єmarsee Speak up! 20:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The death of GeoCities is in about less than two weeks from now. With your files still hosted on Geocities, they will disappear soon. I was wondering if I could have permission to host the files on Geocities on my Youtube account (with full attributions to you of course) until you can have the time to redo them in a higher quality. Thanks.  єmarsee Speak up! 04:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh crap. I realized I don't have the Broadcast One opens and close and the CityPulse 2003/04 open/closes. Half of the presentation site is already down. See here. Is there someway to get these files? Thanks.  єmarsee Speak up! 23:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've complied a list of videos that I don't have from archived versions from archive.org. Unfortunately, the 3rd CKVU page wasn't archived and the two CIVI pages aren't archived fully, so I might have missed more. I counted 49 videos for CKVU (excluding the Global idents) and 20 for CIVI. Thanks.
  • cbut1999open.ram
  • cbuft2001close.rm
  • cbuft2003close.rm
  • chnm2003close.rm
  • chan2001signoff.ram
  • civt-haleemsendoff.rm
  • ckvu2002am-stings.rm
  • ckvu2003open.rm
  • ckvu2003-sept-open.rm
  • ckvu2003-sept-close.rm
  • ckvu2003-sept-close.rm
  • civi-theme1.rm  єmarsee Speak up! 05:14, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ktvt.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ktvt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ktxa.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ktxa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LOGOFTV.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LOGOFTV.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

35 - 2 = 33[edit]

Did it right away :-) Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated KARK, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KARK. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Biker Biker (talk) 21:59, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ftv2001-open.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ftv2001-open.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ftv2004-news-tor05.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ftv2004-news-tor05.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KTSF.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KTSF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ftv2004-newstitle.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ftv2004-newstitle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:46, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ftv2004-news-van01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ftv2004-news-van01.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ktxa.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ktxa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Metrotown[edit]

Hello, Hinto. You have new messages at The Interior's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Interior (Talk) 05:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hinto. I'd like to nominate your new article for DYK, is that okay? If so, we need a "hook". If you're not familiar with DYK hooks, they are a short phrase that highlights an interesting fact from the article. I can come up with one, but as you know the content better, feel free to suggest one. Best, The Interior (Talk) 02:39, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing really pops out right away, so I suggested yours and two more. Here's the nomination page: Template:Did you know nominations/Metrotown, Burnaby. You should watchlist it, in case a reviewer asks for some changes. Will this be your first DYK? The Interior (Talk) 03:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Metrotown, Burnaby[edit]

Nyttend (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

School district articles on the Chinese Wikipedia[edit]

Thank you for working on several of the school district articles! When you have time, are you interested in expanding zh:多倫多教育局 (TDSB) or zh:皮爾區教育局 (PDSB)? Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 05:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KTSF.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KTSF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Hinto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hinto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ftv-luk1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ftv-luk1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ftv2001-open.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ftv2001-open.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ftv2004-news-tor05.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ftv2004-news-tor05.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ftv2004-news-van01.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ftv2004-news-van01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ftv2004-newstitle.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ftv2004-newstitle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wbns-ewn-open.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wbns-ewn-open.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. plicit 02:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Abbott (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enderby. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]