User talk:Hijuecutivo
Welcome[edit]
|
September 2017[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Aristotle, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your interest, but the proposed translation for: 'Aristotle' is not: 'Original research', to check it, you can go to: 'Google translate', explode: 'Aristotle', in Greek alphabet, into: Αριστο and τελεσ, and look for alternative translations of the first term that appears for τελεσ: effusion διάχυση diffusion, effusion, permeation, pervasion, suffusion, interfusion εκροή outflow, outlet, flow, effusion, effluence έγχυση injection, infusion, effusion διαχυτικός effusion διαχυτικότης gushiness, effusion, pervasiveness διαχυτικότητα joviality, effusion, gushiness. Simply, calling this, that can be done in a few seconds: 'original investigation', is going too far, but thanks to give such a high value to my edition.
The addition I made to the 'Sefardi' article was also deleted, under the rationale of: 'futile', or: 'unnecessary', I don't want to say this, the edition added valuable info, formerly not present in the article, but this is for me going beyond the decision power of any editor, additions can be either true or false, in a site with the aim of being an electronic encyclopedia, the more information available is the better, but if the company wishes to keep articles under certain dimensions, you better state rules for this, they have the mouse and the keyboard; for such a small text added, the deletion looks to me as: 'precipitous', 'aggressive'. Thanks, regards. Salut +--Hijuecutivo (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Muhammad, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 10:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks: I changed the term 'patron' in the article about Muhammad, referring to the Kaaba Idols, because: 'Patron', in Christian Theology, is a name than can be attributed only to JahWeh (Matthew 23, 9), same is in the Koran (Sura 5, number 169), to avoid conflicts (1Corynthians 10, 32) and hurting sensitivities, a softer term is better. The addition of the reference to the value of idols inside the Kaaba, that means 'Cube', no problem in checking this, no reference needed, as equivalent to Roman home deities: 'Lares', and Hebrew home idols: 'Teraphim', comes straight from history of religions, it helps understanding the times when Muhammed preached, and may need no further reference, as no reference is needed to show that temples are places build for worship. When I use the choice: 'Minor edition', it refers just to the size of new text, or text changed, assessing the 'weight' or 'importance' of change is better out of editor's responsibilities, additions are either true or false, judging about its appropriateness is better left to readers and users of Wikipedia. I reverted the deletions, please accept the text as it was, if you think the English wording can be improved, I'll be grateful to receive any suggestion. Same applies to the alternative translation of 'Aristotle', you know, it seems I have Greek ancestry, among others, and a bit of this language may still exist deep in my mind. Thanks, regards. Salut +--Hijuecutivo (talk) 07:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 12:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks: I've added information to the list of Aviation Accidents, don't remember having made any deletion, but of mistakes in wording or text I had entered myself. Please: What are you referring to? Regards. Salut +--Hijuecutivo (talk) 09:54, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
September 2018[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Francisco Franco, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization Talk 19:33, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
to General Ization[edit]
My additions were all referenced if you read carefully the explanatory notes. I want to remind you a quotation from French Philosopher Voltaire, in his 'Philosophical letters': 'English don't write history, they write libels'. OK? As a poet said: 'As truth is bitter, I want to throw it out of mouth' (Francisco de Quevedo: 'Pues amarga la verdad, quiero echarla de la boca, y si al alma su hiel toca, esconderla es necedad...). Agur. Gesund +
- What "explanatory notes" are you referring to? Content you add or change must cite reliable, published sources within the article, not in your edit summaries. See WP:BURDEN. General Ization Talk 19:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
OK: 'Historia de la aeronáutica', lt.col Luis de Marimón Riera, Spanish Air Force Academy, April 1976; 'Crónica de la aviación española', Beatriz Pecker, ISBN 9788477370666; 'España, primer ensayo de democracia popular', Julián Gorkin -http://eljanoandaluz.blogspot.com/2012/04/espana-primer-ensayo-de-democracia.html; R Salas-Larrazábal and others in: http://www.ejercitodelaire.mde.es/stweb/ea/ficheros/pdf/0ADDD4B58FF045B4C1257999002F0434.pdf, there are lots of publications describing facts that oppose the 'official' British version about Spanish Civil War; for other issues, I was born in Spain in the 50s, and always lived there. In other article, I added a link to a French history of Henry Mignet and his work: 'Pou du ciel', indicating his wife was murdered by Communist party gunmen in 1944 -http://pouguide.org/biographie-d-henri-mignet. Is it always required that references are put in text, thus describing it in the comments about additions to article is not enough? Thanks, regards. Salut Gesund +
- Lovely. Content you add or change must cite reliable, published sources within the article, not in your edit summaries (or on a Talk page). See WP:BURDEN. General Ization Talk 13:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:The Fairy-Queen, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. General Ization Talk 13:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Francisco Franco. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You apparently didn't pay attention to anything I have told you. General Ization Talk 13:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Autarky. General Ization Talk 13:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Hijuecutivo: What is your relationship to the account Jgrosay? General Ization Talk 14:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:26, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
April 2019[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Incest in the Bible, you may be blocked from editing. You are still making unsourced edits and marking non-minor edits as minor. Stop doing this. Meters (talk) 19:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC) May I suggest you reading about: 'Disruptive physician', in sites such as Medscape? Conclusion is easy: the term 'Disruptive' sometimes blames the victims of mobbing, and there is cyber-mobbing. I never add to Wikipedia articles but true facts, always referenced or in the public domain, never opinions, I could bring here a comment by Nobel Prize Winner Gabriel García-Márquez to another Nobel Prize Winner, José Saramago, in a meeting held in Santiago de Compostela, called by Manuel Fraga Iribarne: 'You Stalinist don't believe in reality', it seems Jose Saramago was not the only one in not believing in reality. Or the Groucho Marx statement: 'Who would you believe, what I say or what youv'e seen?' Danke. Blessings +
January 2020[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 15:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
February 2020[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:83.51.135.150, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
OK, You know INTA is acronym for Instituto Nacional de Tecnica Aeroespacial, National Aero-space Technical Institute, an Spanish government organization founded around 1950, I found no way to do it otherwise, the Wiki system forwarded to INTA disambiguation. Regarding your comments on corrections in grammar and spelling of other writers, I've suffered many of it in the site Stack Exchage, they pretend being usual, but now I guess I could consider it attacks. Sometimes these corrections are a bit mandatory, as otherwise the content will be obscure, e.g, in the Sleeve valve article, Burt-McCollum was once misspelled, making readers lose thread. Thanks. Blessings + Sorry, my keyboard has no visible tildes
Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinkel HeS 011, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INTA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Felix Wankel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DDR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Autarky, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 19:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
For which part do you require a source? About the Greek philosophers, for sure you can read, about the lack of enough involvement of Franco Spain with WW II contenders as to receive raw materials, food, fuels, it's also obvious. In the absence of contrary evidence, that no one could provide about this, please revert deletion. The principle of 'Pressumption of innocence' goes to the 'Inversion of the proof load', meaning it's the one who is against an assertion who must provide contrary evidence. The previous assertions are always to be considered true, until proven otherwise. Blessings +--Hijuecutivo (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
I copy and paste from Wikipedia in Spanish the term 'Autarquía', Spanish translation of 'Autarky', in order not incurring in giving anyone the opportunity of challenging a translation from the text in Spanish Wikipedia (Is it a reliable source?), I won't translate, you have 'Google translate' and others:
'En la Antigua Grecia varias corrientes filosóficas vieron en la Autarquía un ideal de vida. Para las escuelas cínica, estoica, epicúrea y cirenaica, la autarquía es la situación propia del sabio, que se basta a sí mismo para ser feliz, pues no necesita para ello otra cosa que el ejercicio de la virtud. En este sentido, es la independencia del sabio, que junto a la autonomía (libertad) y la ataraxia (imperturbabilidad) configuran las características ideales del sabio'.
You seem living in an English speaking place: should I remind you that Spain is closer to Greece than the UK, and that ancient Greek had towns in Spain? For example 'Ampurias': Ἐμπόριον,1 que significa «mercado», «puerto de comercio»;2., thus, chances of Spaniards for a continuity with Greek culture are higher than those of, let's say: 'wasp'.
About the Spanish period of economical 'Autarquía', please attach to facts, reality, not to the ultra-leftist agit-prop of PSOE and PCE, who are in perpetual anger to anything connected to the Franco Regime. Simply if you read about the times when 'autarquía económica' was implemented in Spain, you'll see it is concomitant with WW II, Spain not fighting in an overt way along allied nor Axis, it is obvious that commodities were in shortage, that allied were busy feeding Stalin. About the pressures from the society of nations to Franco Spain, the blockade, and the Stalin connection, and the timing an reasons for rising the blockade, this is as obvious as there were 2 World Wars, but again, you can read Spanish Wikipedia and other sources in Spanish language, that know better than englishmen, be it so experts as they claim being in Spanish history, what happened in Spain.
Are you a member of Sanhedrin, of Inquisition, of Tribunal for the Doctrine of Faith, of 'Ministry of Truth', a supreme court president, a Source of Law, as to say 'That is incorrect', in a 'Deus ex machina', 'pontifex maximus', apparatchik style, about muy proposals, that are in agreement with generally accepted law principles?
A roller way to discuss truth as that described by some out of your power pyramids is too close to aggresion for my taste, and many fair lawyers would agree. Again, Groucho Marx (equal to March, Marcio): 'Who will you believe, me, or what you've seen?'
I've provided more than necessary evidence that my additions are right; in order to obtain a relievement for the malus you incurred, please make yourself the effort of reverting the non-justified deletions.
You may hold a protected access to the Wikipedia mouse and keyboard, this does not make your activities right or true, same as having a Law diploma don't makes an individual fair and honest.
Do you think your intellectual background is better than mine? Please show it, it's you who are punsihing me, restrainig my freedom; just having the power to do it is not enough righteousness.
I don't want talking about my CV, I still appreciate my integrity and don't want giving any opportunity for a serious attack. By. Blessings +--Hijuecutivo (talk) 18:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 14[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maritsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |