User talk:Henry Wilkerson

January 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Henry Wilkerson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request to be unblocked because one of my edits involved removing profanity from a blocked user's talk page. Henry Wilkerson (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

I suppose that's nice (assuming you're not the sockmaster) but it's not a reason to release you from a sockpuppetry block. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests while blocked. If you do so again, your access to this page will be revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk page[edit]

Is profanity allowed on a user's talk page.Henry Wilkerson (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]