User talk:Hardenian

Sock?[edit]

Hey. I noticed your creation of Michigan–Wisconsin football rivalry as your first substantive edits. Your editing seems to follow the pattern used by an editor who has used sockpuppet accounts. Don't want to be hasty with accusations, but can you clarify -- have you had another account previously? Cbl62 (talk) 00:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sock?[edit]

Hey. I noticed your creation of Michigan–Wisconsin football rivalry as your first substantive edits. Your editing seems to follow the pattern used by an editor who has used sockpuppet accounts. Don't want to be hasty with accusations, but can you clarify -- have you had another account previously? I posted this a minute ago, and you immediately deleted the question. This only raises suspicions further as does your vandalism of Hurricane Felix. Can you please reply to the question about prior accounts? Cbl62 (talk) 00:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing pattern strongly suggests that this is the latest iteration of repeated sockpuppet discussed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CalebHughes/Archive. Cbl62 (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Cbl62. How pathetic. Drmies (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hurricane Felix have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hurricane Felix was changed by Hardenian (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899497 on 2021-10-02T00:06:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Cbl62 (talk) 00:17, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 00:18, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~TNT (she/they • talk) 00:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]