User talk:Haku8645
Welcome[edit]
|
American and British English[edit]
In general, we don't spend a lot of time switching articles between the two spelling standards, because Wikipedia uses both, and neither gets preference. As long as the spelling standard is consistent throughout the article and correct for the style it's written in, we don't worry about it too much. National variety of English, from the Manual of Style. -FisherQueen (Talk) 23:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Shhspecialedition.gif)[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Shhspecialedition.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikimeetup Dubai[edit]
Hi, if you're from UAE or will be around Dubai on November 23/24/25, Is there any possibility of arranging first meetup between Wikipedians? Do let me know what do you think.--Saqib talk 15:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saqib Qayyum (talk • contribs)
Spelling and edit summaries[edit]
Hi Andrew, I know and I am fairly certain that you know that Right- and left-hand traffic is written in British English, and has often had misguided attempts to convert to American spelling like this edit (which left a link to the Loccurbie bomb trial of 2000. I also note that you normally add an edit summary, but just forgot earlier today.
Anyway, this is a suggestion (request) that when you do change the spelling as per WP:RETAIN or similar, could you include something to that effect in your edit summary, please? It's not only a help for me and others who have this on their watchlist, but for others who don't immediately realise that you are changing the spelling to British English (or American English) for consistency, and not that you just think the spelling is wrong.
By the way, there's an option in the Editing tab of My Preferences to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" which I find very useful. I've added this page to my watchlist, should you wish to reply here. Tim PF (talk) 08:42, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Tim PF. I was indeed switching the spelling standard and had just become slightly complacent and in my fervour to seek out every spelling misstep, I overlooked the inclusion of an edit summary. Nonetheless, thank you for your message and it's good to know that others take the integrity of that particular article as seriously as I do! Haku8645 (talk) 01:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Right- and left-hand traffic[edit]
Hi, Haku8645. The title of the subject article is under discussion again. I am alerting you because you participated in a previous discussion on the matter. —Scheinwerfermann T·C01:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-free image use[edit]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of passports, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- The passport images you re-added weren't "missing"; they had been removed because they are non-free images and their use in that particular article does not comply with Wikipedia's policy on non-free use. Not every image found on Wikipedia is freely licensed or in the public domain, so it's a good idea to check an image's licensing before adding it to any article. It's also good practice to check the article's edit history to see if the image may have been previously removed for a specific reason and not just at random. If you're ever unsure about the licensing of a file or how it may be used, you can always ask for assistance at WP:MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- I checked the images' uses and do not understand how they would not qualify for use under the page I edited. They are all straight from each individual passport's Wiki page, where they are used to demonstrate what that passport looks like. I cannot image how the use and intent on each individual passport's page would differ at all from a page that is simply a list of passports and would surely be fair use in that context? Perhaps you can enlighten me. I could certainly understand how, for example, an image of a Canadian passport could not necessarily be used as an illustrative example in an article about a man convicted of passport forgery.Haku8645 (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Each use of a non-free file is required to satisfy all 10 non-free content criteria in WP:NFCCP. The files you re-added fail WP:NFCC#3, WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10c. Non-free use is supposed to be kept to a minimum; this does not mean only one use per image, but it does not mean usage should be minimized as much as possible and restricted to cases where it is contextually significant to a high degree. The passport article is a list article that s basically one big image gallery. This type of image usage is more decorative than contextual and decorative non-free use is not allowed by WP:NFCC. There are links to pages where the file's can be seen as explained in number 6 WP:NFC#UUI, so the image is not needed. You can ask others about this at WT:NFCC, WP:FFD or WP:MCQ if you want. Maybe you can make a persuasive argument for non-free use in this case and change the current consensus. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- I checked the images' uses and do not understand how they would not qualify for use under the page I edited. They are all straight from each individual passport's Wiki page, where they are used to demonstrate what that passport looks like. I cannot image how the use and intent on each individual passport's page would differ at all from a page that is simply a list of passports and would surely be fair use in that context? Perhaps you can enlighten me. I could certainly understand how, for example, an image of a Canadian passport could not necessarily be used as an illustrative example in an article about a man convicted of passport forgery.Haku8645 (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Haku8645. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Haku8645. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Haku8645. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SummerHeightsHighSEDVDcover.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:SummerHeightsHighSEDVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WCBHspecialedition.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:WCBHspecialedition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)