User talk:Gyregimble
Welcome to my Talk Page. Officially started on July 19, 2019. Gyregimble (talk) 16:24, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Gyregimble, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Gyregimble! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC) |
Welcome Gyregimble!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
Women in Red[edit]
Hi there, Gyregimble, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have someone interested in covering tax lawyers. For a new contributor, you already seem to have become quite a proficient editor, making good progress on Joanne Garvey. Nevertheless, if you want to gain further experience in editing, I recommend The Wikipedia Adventure. For women's biographies, you might also like to look at our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. If Garvey is not approved within the next few days, drop a message on my talk page and I'll help you out. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Edit at Tax[edit]
Hi! I don't understand why you removed the archive-urls with this edit. Could it have been a mistake? Sjö (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. I am very sorry. I have no idea how that happened. I simply wanted to correct "individuals" to "an individual's." It absolutely was a mistake. Please let me know if there is anything I can or should do to fix it. Should I undo my edit, or has it already been corrected? Do you happen to know what I did to cause such a removal--is there some random button I accidentally hit? Gyregimble (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know what caused it, but did you perhaps try some editing software or some kind of bot supposed to maintain references? I've seen that some of those can cause unexpected changes.
- As for fixing it, your edit couldn't be undone easily because other editors have edited the same text as you. You could open the "View history" tab, and open the edit before yours (00:42, 16 November 2019 by El C). Then, click "Edit" and make your changes. Go back to the history tab, find the edits by TAnthony and InternetArchiveBot ("prev" links) and apply their changes again. Then everything should be the way you intended. Sjö (talk) 21:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
December events with WIR[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
February with Women in Red[edit]
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
   Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA) (March 6)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
April 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uniform_Fiduciary_Income_and_Principal_Act_(UFIPA), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Cited to additional sources to support topic. Added that law has been adopted in Utah, and that bills are pending in Kansas and Tennessee. Gyregimble (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Uniform Fiduciary Income and Principal Act (UFIPA) has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 16:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)June 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red![edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
AfC notification: Draft:American College of Tax Counsel has a new comment[edit]
- @AntanO: Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the new Articles for Creation submission Draft:American College of Tax Counsel. I did my best to revise the description of the organization in order to limit the close paraphrasing. I hope the changes are sufficient. You also mentioned in a comment, "If possible, add inbox." I am not familiar with that, so could you provide me with more detail or point me in the right direction? Gyregimble (talk) 21:07, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- For the infobox, Fiscale Hogeschool > {{Infobox university}} --AntanO 21:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @AntanO: Awesome! Thank you! I will learn to do an infobox. Gyregimble (talk) 23:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: American College of Tax Counsel has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
AntanO 21:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (July 22)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- @DoubleGrazing: Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the new Articles for Creation submission Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. I did my best to revise the description of the organization in order to highlight the fact that it publishes the most well-respected academic legal journal on the topic of family law in the United States. I also added multiple cites from various third parties referencing the organization and the journal. In addition, I made some minor edits and added an info. box. I hope the changes are sufficient.Gyregimble (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi! The issue here is purely that of notability, which in my view wasn't, and still isn't, met. Please study the notability criteria for organisations, at WP:ORG. Basically, you need to show multiple independent secondary sources discussing this organisation in significant extent and detail. If you feel some of the sources cited already do that, please point them out in case I've missed something. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- @DoubleGrazing:I appreciate the additional insight. Per your recommendation, I reviewed the notability criteria at WP:ORG and added cites to Creighton University, Georgetown Law, Richmond Law, and Wisconsin State to support that the AAML's publications—including a major academic journal and national standards of legal practice—are utilized as a primary resource for the practice of family law in the United States. I also added cites to multiple independent secondary sources discussing the organization in more detail. I hope this helps from a notability perspective.Gyregimble (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (January 17)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
February with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May Women in Red events[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers[edit]
Hello, Gyregimble. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Miller (attorney) (January 6)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin Miller (attorney) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your detailed review and helpful comments. Per your recommendation, I added many additional references to "multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Would you be willing to reconsider the subject as a notable academic under Wikipedia:Notability (academics)? Gyregimble (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Gyregimble. Well done on the improvements. I'm thinking Miller probably does satisfy Criteria 3, 7 and/or 8. However, the draft was still reading too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not, so I've edited and trimmed the page and sources to what I feel is more appropriate. The Bibliography is still far too long and I would suggest you trim is to the most notable 5-10 publications. If you're content to do that, please ping me and I'd then be happy to accept the page. Again, good work! Cabrils (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Justin Miller (attorney) has a new comment[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Miller (attorney) has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cabrils (talk) 23:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Women in Red in February 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers[edit]
Hello, Gyregimble. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary[edit]
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women in Red[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2024[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging