User talk:Gunslinger47

User talk:Gunslinger47/Archive 1

Welcome to my talk page. If you leave a message for me here, I will reply below your message. If you've come here in response to a message I've left for you, I would prefer if you replied to it directly, but I can handle it either way. Feel free to notify me if you think I've overlooked one of your responses. –Gunslinger47

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi, I thought you'd want to know that I have granted you WP:ROLLBACK rights. Rollback is an efficient way to revert vandalism, including multiple sequential edits by one editor. Next to the "undo" link you will now see a "rollback" link. Please take care to use it only to revert obvious disruptive edits, because you cannot write an edit summary explaining your revert. Otherwise, continue using "undo" with edit summaries. Enjoy. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Although, now I feel guilty for not being very active lately. –Gunslinger47 03:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We all have real lives. Nobody pays us to be on Wikipedia. Don't feel guilty. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sonic 06[edit]

My concern was that your rationale in the edit summaries was more about where it fit in the paragraph than the actual content. I'm pretty sure it can be fit in one way or another. As far as CSM goes, they strike me as a reliable source. If you check their "About Us" page at http://www.commonsensemedia.org/about-us/our-mission you can see they clearly have an editorial policy, clearly defined staff, a mission statement, etc, which is usually a good indicator of reliability. As far as expertise goes, they cover "media", something Sonic and video games clearly fall into, so it doesn't seem like they're outside their experise either. If you still disagree, and want to discuss further, we can, but we ought to have it on the article's talk page, or WP:VG or something, where we can get more input. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 14:09, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NarutoUzumaki Shippuden.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NarutoUzumaki Shippuden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of E-Tools for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E-Tools is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Tools until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. damiens.rf 12:41, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wolverine: Origins for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wolverine: Origins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolverine: Origins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]