User talk:GreyDiomed

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GreyDiomed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here GreyDiomed (talk) 05:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It may be true that you misunderstood copyright, as many new editors do. However, you don't need to know any "rules" to realise that deliberately trying to give the impression of being two people, one of whom is independently supporting what the other does, is dishonest. Nothing you have said so far shows any sign of acknowledging that fact. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GreyDiomed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After much reflection and reading, then re-reading the rules and regulations, I realize my previous actions were deceptive, by using two accounts to manipulate the information, I will never do this again. Prior to I was unfortunately unfamiliar with what Sock Puppeting was, I only knew how to create pages. My older account, Grey Diomed, has made enough edits and additions to receive "Editor" status. I was only trying to conceal my identity from the prying eyes by utilizing Rober_King_Carter. I inadvertently figured out how to publish the sockpuppeting page through this, though not trying to intentionally be deceitful. And, when I did publish the page I went right along because I wasn't aware of the rules-now I am. GreyDiomed (talk) 04:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You were overtly being deceitful. If you need this explicitly spelled out in rules, we are best served by leaving you blocked. Yamla (talk) 16:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.