User talk:Glasgow87

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Glasgow87, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Blue Riband► 20:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sustainable Healthcare (August 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello - I am sorry there was copyright issues, this was not intended. I thoughts I had referenced everything that was a direct quote or citation and the rest was my own work - but it has ben re-written several times so perhaps that is why the issue occured. Are you able to specifically tell me which parts were flagged as 'copyright content'? Would the next best step be to either ensure these have a proper citation if missed or re-write them? Thank you for our help Glasgow87 (talk) 19:32, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Glasgow87! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sustainable Healthcare[edit]

I've had a look at this draft. I have not reviewed it carefully but I know that a WP:COI editor such as your self will have a difficult time maintaining WP:NPOV over a relatively large contribution of text. The text will need to be reviewed carefully and ideally by a volunteer editor familiar with this topic area. Your draft has been in the queue for a long time awaiting such an editor. It is unlikely one will show up. What is likely to happen is another reviewer will come by and decline the draft on blanked WP:COI/WP:NPOV and you can try to improve and re queue the draft. An alternative is to trim down the draft and references to the extent that an editor such as myself can more readily review it. ~Kvng (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your helpful feedback. I'm not sure what the best thing to do is. I agree that it seems unlikely an editor who is familiar with the topic - but who doesn't have a conflict of interest - will come along (by definition if an individual is interested in this area they probably have a conflict!). If I were to make it shorter, are you able to give an indication of how much shorter it would need to be? Thank you for your help. Glasgow87 (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Half to 1/3rd its current size. ~Kvng (talk) 00:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sustainable Healthcare (December 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Even though I am declining the draft I must admit that it is close to reaching the criteria for acceptance
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 17:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Pichemist, I was aware the article was likely to be rejected based on the advice given by Kvng on the 29th of November (I'm not sure if you can see this but it's on the talk page of the draft). This editor had advised me to cut it down by a half to a third of its current size which I plan to do soon. Do you have any advice on any areas that I could improve or cut out to make it more likely to be accepted? Any thoughts would be appreciated.
I also noted on the talk page it says I have been paid by the Centre for Sustainable healthcare - I'm actually a volunteer - do you know if there is a way to change it to volunteer?
Thank you for taking the time to look at the article anyway. Glasgow87 (talk) 20:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sustainable Healthcare has been accepted[edit]

Sustainable Healthcare, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 13:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Glasgow87&oldid=1142267078"