User talk:Geenius at Wrok

Welcome, from Journalist[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Geenius at Wrok, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

^{Journalist ^C./ ^{Holla @ me!}

Hey...[edit]

...I know you... --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm intrigued by your NPOV (a reference you made on the page on Christopher Alexander). What does NPOV mean? (From: Hairy poker monsterHairy poker monster (talk) 10:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Neutral Point of View. --Geenius at Wrok (talk) 13:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you 91.84.84.208 (talk) 13:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhatToDoCover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:WhatToDoCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

North Shore[edit]

It's been my experience that the admins view that sort of thing as very low level, and are loathe to intevene if editors like us are maintaining the page. Until the IPs cough up unassailable sources that their favorite towns are in the North Shore, we can keep on reverting them.
The article gets a good level of views, according to this tool. Speciate (talk) 04:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geenius. Thanks for your ongoing work on North Shore. Just a reminder, however, that you should keep edit summaries civil at all times—especially when dealing with anonymous users, since it's our policy not to bite the newbies. I appreciate that the conduct of these other users is not exemplary, but certainly in the most recent instance there is no reason not to believe that the user wasn't acting in good faith. They may not understand the codes of practice that we follow here, but they probably thought that what they were doing was improving the encyclopedia, or at least allowed. JNSQ (talk) 10:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning additional communities also considered to be apart of the North Shore area in the North Shore area article[edit]

I saw that you have previously contributed a lot to the article North Shore (Chicago). This is why, I would appreciate if you could share your knowledge and express your opinion on this matter. TVJunkie2 (talk) 21:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]}