User talk:Fylindfotberserk/Archives/2017/December
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Fylindfotberserk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Quote
Can you please add a quotation from the source for this change. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Sitush:I only merged two sentences into one. I wasn't able to see the source either.Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Sitush: That's totally OK mate. And yes caste articles do turn into garbage fast if not monitored. I remember a lot of Jat related articles were heavily influenced by that abomination of a website jatland.com Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)