User talk:Fuzzster87

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Fuzzster87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Quantium Solutions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Whispe ring 20:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quantium Solutions[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quantium Solutions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Whispe ring 20:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For goodness sake, learn to do links properly. You have created a DRV entry. Why on earth did you not include in it a link to your new draft? It is now in a proper place: user:Fuzzster87/sandbox. Note that Wikipedia is not a reliable source - you never create refs to it! Your draft still stands no chance because it lacks links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:43, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are the most unhelpful admin I have ever come across here, and I will call your actions and behaviors to the attention of your peers and betters. Enough is enough. Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doing the Admins job for him—advice to get your article in shape[edit]

Fuzzster, please consider either moving the article to the new article creation wizard (link appears in the template text in the speedy deletion section above), or using a comparable good quality mid-size and/or Asian business article as a template (re-creating their structure vis-a-vis section headings, chosen infobox, etc., via cut-and-paste to your sandbox). Either way, to reverse an Admin's unjust initial action—since, in my experience creating and developing chemistry pages, all of what I'm calling on you to doing now could have been done on the original stub article—you must create a new stub above reproach, by picking a good, established WP business article on a company that you think comparable to this company, and edit your article to be similar in content and quality.

Two notes: no unsourced content, rather use good independent business sources (WSJ, Forbes, etc., see [WP:V]), and avoid all the frowned-upon, non-encyclopedic words and phrases (see [WP:WTW]).

In particular, I expect when I see the article again, it will (i) be longer, containing usual business detail about Company founding, history, current size, sector, leadership, etc., (ii) have inline citations with properly formatted references, e.g., using a cut and paste from the example article, or an otherwise constructed simple ^[1] type of entry for each cited article (click on the Edit tab of this Talk section, to see how to create such an inline citation, if you do not know already), (iii) be linked to other relevant WP articles using the other article name markup code that you will find, again, in looking at this Talk or your example good WP business article on their Edit tabs, (iv) be split into sections, and so have a Contents box appearing, and (iv) have a business-appropriate info box. See also earlier comments in Talk (now conveniently archived by our dear Admin) regarding other specific content elements that will be of interest to business readers (M&A history, etc.). Cheers, will look back in a week. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 17:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two further guiding notes: First, some of the required example information you need to create a good article can be found at the SingPost article, though it is a bit large (and as the parent Co. over this subsidiary, not a good choice) to be the WP article you use as an example template, per se. Second, you may wish to create/improve upon some simple sentences about each of the current subsidiaries of SingPost, at the SingPost article, so that there is related, brief high quality content about the subsidiaries in the parent Co. article—using same high standards of quality for those edits to SingPost article, as described above (esp. regarding citations). Later, after your article appears on the subsidiary, the SingPost article can link to it through these statements. Cheers, Le Prof. Leprof 7272 (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leprof, thanks for the tips. I am using this Logistics company as a benchmark for content - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namakkal_Transport_Carriers. Do let me know if it will be OK to use this article's structure similarly for Quantium? I noticed the thread got archived as well, which is nonsense. But for articles like these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapid_Response_Services I do not know why they are considered alright. Maybe you can explain why? Fuzzster87 (talk) 10:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Quantium Solutions (June 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Quantium Solutions.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 17:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Quantium Solutions (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fuzzster87, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Fuzzster87. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 07:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 07:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Quantium Solutions (June 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 12:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^ Author, year, "Title", Publication title, Date or volume:page range. See [URL link], accessed DD-MM-YYYY.

[1] Author, year, "Title", Publication title, Date or volume:page range. See [URL link], accessed DD-MM-YYYY.

[1]