User talk:FredFigglehornfan

August 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nigahiga, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nigahiga was changed by FredFigglehornfan (u) (t) deleting 11120 characters on 2010-08-05T06:43:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Shane Dawson. Thank you. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 06:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Fred: The Movie, you may be blocked from editing. Active Banana (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Lucas Cruikshank, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 117Avenue (talk) 12:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marvin Marvin[edit]

The article Marvin Marvin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced hoax.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 117Avenue (talk) 13:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010_2[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please do not create hoaxes. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Fred: The Movie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 117Avenue (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Fred: The Movie, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 117Avenue (talk) 04:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeatedly adding unsourced material to wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FredFigglehornfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I keep telling you guys the sources and the scources are accurate but you just dont listen I really dont know how to cite something please stop blocking me

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but if you do not know (or otherwise refuse to learn) to cite what you add (which, mind you, is as simple as adding <ref>URL of source or other print source</ref> after what you add), then you should not be editing here. –MuZemike 05:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nigahiga, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nigahiga was changed by FredFigglehornfan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941557 on 2011-03-07T20:52:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lucas Cruikshank. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 117Avenue (talk) 07:16, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lucas Cruikshank, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 117Avenue (talk) 06:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

You're lucky to have escaped blocking after your edit to Nigahiga a couple of days ago. I've declined a recent report on you to WP:AIV because you finally stopped adding unsourced information and commented on the talk page, and the Nigahiga thing is, I suppose, stale, but this is just a warning that if you try something like that again, you're going to get blocked indef. You've had more than enough warnings. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for You have been blocked for disruptive editing - continually adding unsourced material to the encyclopedia. I suggest that you take the time to read WP:RS and find out what Wikipedia classes as a reliable source or you may find that the next block is indefinite.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 22:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fred the movie dvd cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fred the movie dvd cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]