Hello, Forfuxake, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Thanks for uploading Image:TANFL Logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 11:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:BPayneHobart1966GF.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:TFL Statewide Logo 1986-1994.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:TANFL Logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Do NOT add Cooee to state league history. Cooee's final season of existence was in the NWFU in it's final season. It then MERGED with the Burnie Tigers to form the Burnie Hawks, and it was that merged entity that joined the State League in 1987. Please recheck your facts because they contradict the Burnie Advocate newspaper and the NWFU ladder in 1986 - which finished after the grand final as;
ULVERSTONE
WYNYARD
LATROBE
PENGUIN
SMITHTON
East Devonport
Burnie Tigers
Cooee
Devonport
And please don't leave messages for other users on the article pages. They go on the talk pages. Thank you. AFL-Cool (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tasmanian Football League, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -- Chuq(talk) 00:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Template doesn't specifically refer to any problem as such. If it could be demonstrated where the problem is, I could rectify it.
I thought it was AFL_Cool just being small minded and doing that because I called him out on his lack of knowledge on another page.
Thanks Chuq! PS: Is that you from Austadiums? Forfuxake (talk) 04:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To answer your question - the whole article needs to be fortified with citations. A number of statements (too many to mention 100 percent) look very much like WP:OR. Some may well be true but it needs sources otherwise it can be removed. Just as a start - and I'm not saying these points are untrue but they still need sources;
You need to cite where it says that the TANFL met in 1944 for a 1945 return and the "fact" that they went district instead of club.
Clarence and New Norfolk's origins (the SEDFL did not exist before WW2 incidentally).
The merger of New Town and Glenorchy.
The claim that the succeeding period was the strongest era in the league's history (that reads like an opinion which is not allowed).
The Winfield sponsorship.
And that's just the District Football part. There are issues with the rest as well, but I'm just giving you an idea of what you need to do. This isn't about small mindedness. This is about WP policy. This could be a candidate for good article status if you could just cite stuff. Just remember what I said about primary sources, okay? AFL-Cool (talk) 09:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:NewTownMagpiesDesign.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:GlenorchyStormDesign.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Fair use rationale for File:Youngtownoval.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Youngtownoval.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aaroncrick(Tassie Boy talk) 05:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File copyright problem with File:Winfield_Cup_logo.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading File:Winfield_Cup_logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1989premiers.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 18:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You have a nice user name.--Macrocosmic microcosm (talk) 08:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Hahaha thanks, I got that from trying to sign up, everyone had every user name I'd tried to sign up, then I came up with that one LOL. Forfuxake (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blues88.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cup of joy.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Yeah, it's amusingly clever, but it could be a problem later on.
I strongly recommend you file a request at WP:Changing usernames for something that is less likely to make you look like a vandal. (Don't get me wrong - you haven't misbehaved. But sneaky vandals like to use this sort of name, to be obnoxious.) DS (talk) 13:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As you can see from various other articles, "season" is listed without a capital. AFL and NFL as examples. Regards. Cs-wolves(talk) 02:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Cool, that's fine! Forfuxake (talk) 07:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TSFL LOGO MONO.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SWL LOGO COLOUR.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Swl2000logo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Wrest Point TSL Logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Wrest Point TSL Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tfllogo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TANFL Logo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TFL Statewide Logo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Finals crowds alarm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Clarencelogo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Clarencelogo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:HFC 2009 TSL Logo.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:HFC 2009 TSL Logo.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:1996TFLGF.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:Devonport Oval.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Devonport Oval.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:West Park - Burnie.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:West Park - Burnie.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CananoreDesign.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HobartFCDesign.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:39, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Forfuxake. I notice that several images you've uploaded have been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files. The reason is that you have given misleading or incorrect information about the images on their file description pages. For example, consider File:TSFL LOGO MONO.JPG. On the image description page, you claim, "I (Forfuxake) created this work entirely by myself," and say that you have released the image under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license. However, at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 27#File:TSFL LOGO MONO.JPG you say that this logo was forwarded to you by a representative of the Mercury Newspaper. So you did not create this work entirely by yourself, and you have not provided any evidence that the copyright holder of this image (whoever that is) has actually agreed to release the image under a Creative Commons license. This is a big problem. If you are not the artist who originally drew the logo, then you are not the creator, nor are you the copyright holder, and so you cannot decide that the image should be released under a Creative Commons license. What you need to do is to correct the information on the file description page so that it is actually true, and then contact the copyright holder and ask for the logo to be released under a free license (see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for more details). Unless we can secure such permission, the image will be considered non-free here on Wikipedia and is likely to be deleted (unless it can be shown to meet our strict non-free content policy). Let me know if you need help or have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 22:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi mate. Loving the work you're doing with the TFL, the season articles look great. Perhaps you could help me out here, do you know if the Shane Williams who is listed as the Sandy Bay coach in your 1989 TFL Statewide League season article is this guy? Cheers. Jevansen (talk) 07:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gday Jev! Thanks for the kudos mate. Yes that's the same bloke, he ended up being an around-the-grounds commentator for ABC Radio in the old Statewide League after he got the bullet from the Bay in 1990. I also think he might've had something to do with coaching juniors down this way as well somewhere. Last I heard of him, he was doing live crosses at Bellerive a few years back on the same station during Devils VFL matches.Forfuxake (talk) 15:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for getting back to me. I'll update Shane's page. Keep up the good work. Jevansen (talk) 06:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:NWFA logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
As part of the Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links project, I have edited a number of pages that you have created which all featured large numbers of ambiguous links to Attendance. Since it appeared that all the links were for the dictionary definition, and the closest applicable page on Wikipedia I could find was List of sports attendance figures, I elected to de-link all of them. It looks like you are very active in creating pages related to the Tasmanian Football League, many of which feature these links. I'm not sure where I'm going with this- I guess I'm concerned that this could turn into some weird edit war. Anyway, from my perspective, I'd prefer that the links not exist, but I don't know if it's all part of some larger plan I'm not aware of. Let me know what you think- I don't have a problem de-linking all of them en masse, but I didn't want you to think that I was crazily laying siege to a whole pile of your pages either. Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Have you noticed that the for and against totals in the ladders fail to balance, that what you get when you copy straight out the The Mercury. Purrum (talk) 04:19, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
G'day Purrum! Cheers for that. Which years would be the ones not matching up? I'll go back through the results and add them myself if they don't stack up. The Muckery can be a bit ropey at times like that and also some of the print is that small that I may have made a mistake writing it down. Forfuxake (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1970, 1972, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987,1990,1999
1995 the win and losses don't add up. Purrum (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, are you talking about the points "For" versus points "Against" or actual wins and losses mate? I'm a bit confused.
As an example in 1970:
Sandy Bay had wins in Rounds 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 & 20 (15 wins)
Clarence had wins in Rounds 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19 & drew 16 (13 wins, 1 draw)
Norfik' had wins in Rounds 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 16, 18, 20 & drew 3 & 19 (11 wins, 2 draws)
Nth Hobart had wins in Rounds 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 20 & drew 18 & 19 (11 wins, 2 draws)
Glenorchy had wins in Rounds 6, 12, 13 & drew 3 & 16 (3 wins, 2 draws)
Hobart had wins in Rounds 2, 7, 17 & drew 18 (3 wins, 1 draw)
1999 was a huge kerfuffle due to the Southern Cats being wound up by their executives after seven rounds. They stripped the Cats of all points and awarded points to all teams that had play them up to that point, then awarded points to the teams who were having a bye from there-after, created by the Cats going under.
If you're talking about the scores not adding up I'll go back and re-add them again to make sure they balance out.
Generally some of the publications do have some discrepancies between the Mercury and the League publications (eg: 1977 Glenorchy were always listed in league publications as kicking 3.14 (32) in the Grand Final, but the Mercury had 5.14 (44) with five goal scorers listed).
Former TFL historian Alf Upton always claimed the lowest crowd at a match was 531 in 1979, but I've come across lower in the 1940's, I'll keep my eye out anyway. Thanks for letting me know!! Forfuxake (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was talking about the for and against for those years listed except 1995
In 1995 the wins column add up to 97 and the losses 99, there was one draw , I should have been clearer Purrum (talk) 02:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:StatewideLeague2000.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 10:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey dude. As per the others on your talk page, thoroughly enjoying looking through old Tasmanian footy results. Just wanted to alert you to the 1965 TANFL Grand Final - the Robins have an impossible half-time score listed (they go from 4.1 at QT, to 2.12 at HT, to 5.8 at 3QT). Aspirex (talk) 11:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh yes, thanks for that dude! I've fixed that now. Must've been half asleep when I typed that (more than likely was).
Glad you like the articles, terrific job on the '67 State Final article too - excellent stuff! — thanks. Aspirex (talk) 06:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Will start doing a few more pages in the next couple of months, business has been hectic over the past three months or so and haven't had time to research much. Forfuxake (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Me again. Same sort of thing, on the 1958 TANFL Preliminary Final scores. Also, the 1957 first semi final scores are possible, but look a bit suspicious; did Hobart actually have a huge nine-goals-to-one final quarter to recovery from a 31 point deficit? Aspirex (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aspirex! Nice spotting, it was indeed wrong, it was SB 13.18 (96) not 13.8 (86) for the '58 Prelim Final.
Also, yes Hobart booted 9.3 to 1.3 in the final quarter to win the '57 First Semi. The week after that North and Glenorchy met on the record wettest single day ever recorded in Hobart (156mm)!Forfuxake (talk) 17:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What are the clash jumpers in the TSL? Seeing that Glenorchy, Devonport , Laudervale and North Launceston have clashing jumpers, what is the away strip?
When did North Launceston revert back to North Launceston from the Northern Bombers ? Purrum (talk) 23:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Purrum!
Glenorchy wear a bottle green and white (think Port Power) uniform when playing in Devonport, the green is like a Peppermint Crisp wrapper colour.
Lauderdale wear the Geelong strip (their former colours until they entered the SFL Premier League a few years ago) when they play North Launceston away.
North Launceston wear a grey/off white uniform with a "Northern Bombers" logo on the chest and black numbers away to Lauderdale.
As for Devonport, I can't say I've ever seen them wear a clash strip, I don't think they've played Glenorchy away in the two years the comp's been running.
North Launceston's actual nickname is "Northern Bombers" and that's just what they were referred to as by the media and the club themselves after they ditched the North Launceston Robins moniker after 1997, until they joined the TSL.
Curiously, the senior and reserve grade teams are called North Launceston, but their Under-19's team is known simply as "Northern Bombers".
Strange - but it is Tasmania after all!! Forfuxake (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An interesting piece of news about Triabunna, but it needs a source and I have tagged it accordingly. Footy Freak7 (talk) 23:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for File:Ulverstone Logo.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Ulverstone Logo.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
Had to revert your changes from TFL to TSL, because that causes confusion with soccer and it's also using the commercial name instead of the proper name. Also, I haven't tagged it yet, but could you cite where you got those updated crowd figures that you edited? Footy Freak7 (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
G'day FF7!, Sorry, the SFL crowd edit was me checking how to do something and I wiped out a number with my spacebar and typed the wrong one in LOL. Since reverted.
That's cool re:TFL/TSL. PS: What's happened to AFL Cool? Forfuxake (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AFLSTBanner.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --multichill (talk) 20:02, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:TBT Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ArmbrustTalkContribs 15:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey mate, I don't think we've ever met, which is odd considering we both mainly edit Aussie rules articles. Anyway, I realise that my edits to the East Launceston Football Club article were all pretty minor, but I don't think they were "pointless", as they were all to help the article comply with the manual of style. I do appreciate that you've gone to the trouble of creating a good article and all my edits were intended to do was to slightly improve that effort. If you think any of my edits have made the article worse, I'll be happy to try and rectify the problem. So, is there anything that you specifically don't like about my edits? Also, when creating articles, please add references to them. I knew the club was notable, but without references, many editors from other parts of the world might not have. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 20:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No we possibly have not, no. I take it that you're relatively new here and eager to edit? The edits I find annoying are things such "Red and blue", "winners" instead of Winners (lower casing where it looks tidier being in upper) - this makes it looks sloppy, unprofessional and teenage-like and I don't want them on articles I put up, thankyou.
I also want these articles spaced out properly, I do not want them where all the sentences all run into each other, again, sloppy and unprofessional. If I find them annoying in future I will undo them.
You will also find that with Tasmanian football there is not a great deal of information out there, that is where a good deal of local information and an intimate inside knowledge is an advantage. Forfuxake (talk) 20:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Slightly amused to be called "relatively new" by someone with less than 2000 edits, but yes, I guess I haven't been around as long as you (only since April last year). Firstly, I changed "red & blue" to "red and blue" because WP:& recommends against it, although it does state they can be used in infoboxes, I think it looks sloppy and unprofessional use ampersands (but it's your article, so change it back if you wish). As to the capitalisation, that's something I won't budge on. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters) and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Section headings might be an interesting read for you, but to summarise it, Wikipedia does not use title case, it uses sentence case for headings, by which I mean only proper nouns are capitalised. As to the spacing out properly, I'm not sure what you really mean by that, but it's fairly ridiculous continually add <br /> all the time (but, again, it's your article, so add them back if you really want). I do understand that it can be difficult to reference articles on Tasmanian football (writing Ken Hall (footballer) is about the closest I've got to Tassie football), but you per WP:V (one of Wikipedia's core policies), everything you add to an article must be referenced to a reliable source. There are editors who make it their mission to remove all unsourced content from articles, so please don't let this happen to the useful articles you write. For example, if you're using the full points footy book to as your reference for most of the article (as it appeared you did for the East Launceston article), please just add that to the references section in future (as I've done for this article). As I'm writing this, I realise that you have re-capitalised everything; could you please explain why words like blue and red are proper nouns and need to be capitalised? Jenks24 (talk) 21:08, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the article on Absolute Bowling would be the same, because I authored it! My username there was Tiger. Absolute Bowling website, which was owned by Andrew Tonkin from Melbourne no longer exists by the way.Forfuxake (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mornington Tenpin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. The article about Mornington is correct information. I'm a former employee there, played at the centre I'm also longtime friends with two former managers of the facility and also, any statistical data provided comes courtesy of the 1992 STTBA (Southern Tasmanian Tenpin Bowling Association) end of season report from that year. By the way, CMC ran the centre for tax reasons.Forfuxake (talk) 19:26, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
G'day mate. I have just patrolled your new article. In its present state it is vulnerable for nomination for deletion for a couple of reasons - firstly, there is very little to demonstrate that this little footie club, disbanded 16 years ago, is sufficiently notable to warrant its own article on Wikipedia. Have a look at WP:NOTABILITY. Secondly, your article contains no reference or in-line citation to allow independent verification of anything you have written. On Wikipedia anything that is likely to be challenged needs to be supported by some information about the source. Have a look at WP:VERIFY.
For some good basic information about supplying references in Wikipedia articles, have a look at WP:REFBEGIN. Cheers! Dolphin(t) 08:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This 'little footie club' you mention had a good history thanks Dolphin. It had its roots stemming back to 1894, but closed the original club down to eradicate debts and rebranded itself with a metropolitan name to be included in the state's most popular league. Just because it wasn't playing in the AFL doesn't mean it was some crappy little tinpot outfit.Forfuxake (talk) 19:04, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:QueenslandDesign.PNG listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:QueenslandDesign.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi (talk) - that's ok - you can delete that one, I've not used it at all and if it's ever needed I can always rename and re-up. Cheers! Forfuxake (talk) 11:31, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on File:Plapp.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The-Pope (talk) 14:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for April 19[edit]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free rationale for File:WynyardvsNHobart1967.jpg[edit]
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:GlenorchyAltDesign.PNG[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:GlenorchyAltDesign.PNG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:SandyBay1946.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:SandyBay1946.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Clarence1981.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Clarence1981.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:North Launceston's 1998 seniors premiership team.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:North Launceston's 1998 seniors premiership team.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (File:TFLStatewideDesign.PNG)[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:TFLStatewideDesign.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:TBT Bowling.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Forfuxake. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for uploading File:Clarencelogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:KingboroughTigersLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Ulverstone Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:TasStateLeaguelogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free rationale for File:HFCLionsDesign.PNG[edit]
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Forfuxake. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, can you please add your sources to 1997 STFL season? At the moment, it is at risk of being moved to draftspace. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are continuing to create unreferenced articles such as 1999 SFL season. Please see WP:V and WP:BURDEN - you must add sources to articles you create. 'External links' means 'suggestions for further reading' rather than indicating that it was used to inform the writing of the article. Please stop this and respond to messages. WP:Communication is required, and continuing this behaviour is likely to lead to an indefinite block. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The scores and statistics all come from the Hobart Mercury and Huon News publications from the State Library (LINC) via microfiche!
Thanks, please add that to the articles you create, with dates and page numbers. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Forfuxake, can you please add your sources to these articles? They are at risk of being moved to draftspace. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Again, can you please add your sources to the articles you have created. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Forfuxake", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you.
Username is designed to sound like swearing, but also swearing when annoyed,, which doesn't exactly give off a collegiate vibe..
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Forfuxake: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 03:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TheMapDesign.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
File:Dev v burnie 95.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dev v burnie 95.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Flickerd (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Forfuxake, just thought I'd give you a bit more clarification on the usage of icons on the SFL season pages as I couldn't fit it all in the edit summary. Since the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian rules football/Archive 6#Use of icons, the consensus has been to not include/remove existing icons from articles that fall into the WP:AFL project, which the SFL season pages do. The discussion stemmed from WP:ICONDECORATION whereby icons should serve an encyclopedic purpose and not merely be decorative, and as already stated, the consensus is to not include them on pages such as season pages, lists etc. The only time you'll find they're used is on league pages in team tables and in grand final type pages. I'm also planning on getting the SFL season pages up to formatting standards and having the games listed in templates, i.e. {{AFLGame}}, and the use of icons in those templates has always been discouraged. It's also a good idea for future reference when reverting someone to provide an edit summary so they know why you've made the change. Thanks for all your hard work otherwise on Tasmanian football related pages though. Flickerd (talk) 05:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The roster match set up you've done with the 2016 and 2017 pages looks good, however I would prefer to see quarter-by-quarter scores in ALL finals series matches as is the case with the Grand Final (the local media do use these for reference at various times I've noticed with the TFL pages and will likely do so with these).
I understand you taking club colours down from each individual match but I feel it would be necessary to keep them in the section entitled "Participating Clubs" as a number of these clubs have used different colours and jumpers down the years.
Namely Hobart, Kermandie, Glenorchy, North Hobart, New Norfolk, Central Hawks, Lauderdale for example.
Also, I would prefer to see neat capitalisation used (ie: "Medal Winners" as opposed to Medal winners, Grand Final as opposed to grand final as examples).
I'm not opposed to having the colours in the participating clubs for the reasons you've stated as it would aid comprehension for the reader. As for the capitalisation, this is a big no no on Wikipedia per MOS:CAPS and MOS:HEADCAPS as they are in sentence case rather than every word capitalised. The exception to this is if it's a proper noun, so for example, 2017 SFL Grand Final is capitalised as it's an official event, but just having grand final is generic and thus reverts to sentence case. Having all quarter results for finals is fine, I just did it how all other season pages have been done, but it doesn't hurt to have it. Thanks, Flickerd (talk) 03:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet notability requirements for WP:LISTN, in addition, there aren't any sources to WP:VERIFY the content. Also falls a bit into WP:LISTCRUFT.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, Forfuxake. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tasmanian Football League, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -- Chuq (talk) 00:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
wikimedia.org.
Thanks for uploading File:TFLStatewideDesign.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
