User talk:Flags-Chaser

User page

Tell me

Sandbox

Sandbox 2

Welcome!

Hello, Flags-Chaser, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 15:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aus Open articles[edit]

Nice work! :) --pfctdayelise (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) --Flags-Chaser 00:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ligat ha'Al 2006/07[edit]

OK, the context part looks good, but there are no sources. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Team names[edit]

Unfortunately UEFA have got the name of almost every team wrong:

There is no hyphen in Tel Aviv or Kfar Saba.
There is no hyphen or "c" in Petah Tikva.
Bnei Sakhnin dropped the word Hapoel from their title in 1996.
There is no such team as Hapoel Nazareth, they are Hapoel Nazareth Illit.
Bnei Yehuda Tel Aviv are always referred to as just Bnei Yehuda, even though it is their official full name.
The standard naming procedure for football clubs on Wikipedia is to use F.C. not FC. Plus, aside from when it is prominent (e.g. F.C. Ashdod) the F.C. part is never used except in the full title on the article.

I hope this clears it up. Good work on the articles though! Number 5 7 18:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you don't accept it, those are the correct names of the teams; just click on the links above and you will see how the cities are spelt. I lived in Israel for several years so I know what I'm talking about. If you want further proof, check out how the Israeli press spells the names here. I have no idea why UEFA got it so wrong, but they have. Number 5 7 19:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the history section of the club's website (which features some very bad spelling!), the official name is indeed Hakoah Maccabi Amidar Ramat Gan, however they refer to themselves as just Hakoah Maccabi Ramat Gan (see the banner at the top). Bizarrely the press drop the Maccabi bit and add Amidar (one.co.il call them Hakoah Amidar Ramat Gan). Anyway, as I pointed out above, you should use the common name when referring to a team aside from in the introduction to its article. If anything, I would just stick with Hakoah Ramat Gan. Number 5 7 19:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When writing the article about the club itself, its appropriate to use the full name, but when talking about clubs in other articles just the common name is enough. You wouldn't see an article on the FA Cup where someone wrote "Wimbledon F.C. beat Liverpool F.C. in the 1988 final" - it would be "Wimbledon beat Liverpool". Similarly, if you were writing about South American football, you would talk about River Plate and Flamengo rather than Club Atlético River Plate and Clube de Regatas do Flamengo - it just fills the article up with unnecessary words (and in some cases can confuse people, as clubs are better known by their short names than their long ones - would you know who Philips Sport Vereniging are for instance)? An extreme case is Sporting Clube de Portugal; many fans are unlikely to know them by this name, but rather as Sporting Lisbon (for precedent, this is the name used in the UEFA Champions League 2006-07 article). Number 5 7 19:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm glad we got this resolved quite quickly (though I see you have cheekily reverted Bnei Yehuda to Bnei Yehuda Tel Aviv! I have to say that I have never heard anyone add the TA bit). I do use messenger, but I prefer to stay private on here! Feel free to write to me via my talk page if you need assistance though :) להתראות, Number 5 7 20:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

hadd gratuláljak, az ilyen szerkesztésekhez [1] amiben elrontod a mások által helyesen alkalmazott html formázást helytelenre. Cassan 10:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

come on! correct it! Cassan 10:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good. You disorder the correct html codes, and this is right. Fck. Cassan 10:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I told you 2 times. You have disordered the correct html codes. NEVER do this again. Thak you. Cassan 10:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liar. I gave you the link. Cassan 20:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. You made mistakes and then you deny, when I show you... Cassan 06:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ligat ha'Al[edit]

Why did you remove my extended statistics table? Did you know how long it took me to make and that I purposely saved all the newspapers at the end of the season to upload stuff like this. This is not your personal page, if you have a problem with it, use the discussion page. -NYC2TLV 00:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hapoel-kfs.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hapoel-kfs.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ligat ha'Al (once again)...[edit]

Why do you constantly revert the given standards? Firstly, they will be in use in all of the 2008(-09) season articles in UEFA. Additionally, the templates are much more easy to edit than the current complicated table structure.

Furthermore, I do not get your "We have three rounds in Israel" argument. Countries like Slovakia, Serbia, Croatia and even Denmark also have three rounds. This fact is stated both in the table of contents of the article and right before the results tables, as you can also see here and here.

Thirdly, information access always has to be superior, especially over design. If someone needs just the results of Beitar's home games against Maccabi Tel Aviv, he has to search the whole page - when formatted in the current for mat - in order to retrieve them, whereas a table format, no matter how it may look like, provides the desired data fast and accurate. Do not come up with the argument that single rounds of games are important. This kind of distinction belongs rather in a sports almanac than into an encyclopedia. Big paper encyclopedias like Encyclopedia Britannica also do not list every round, they just print the results boxes, if they do it at all. If one really needs to know the exact round or even the date of a match, there are enough archives like RSSSF where his knowledge desires will be satisfied.

Finally, the argument "We have done so all the time" is a rather weak argument, as it opposes all kind of progress. You need changes in order to have progress. Changes are always accompanied by new ideas. Not all new ideas may be good, but that's why there are talk and discussion pages on this site in order to discuss pro and contra. Additionally, the results are listed only since Ligat ha'Al 2005-06, which also weakens this position. The templates exist since the begin of the 2007-08 season. They may still have some flaws, but they are, in my opinion, better than the various types of result display that have existed before.

I may quote NYC2TLV, who said on your very own talk page:"This is not your personal page, if you have a problem with (changes made to an article), use (this article's) discussion page." I may remind you further on a wikipedia guideline: "Assume good faith on made changes." Everybody should follow those two simple rules to make this place a better one. Hockey-holic (talk) 11:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space[edit]

Hey there Flags-Chaser, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Flags-Chaser/Sandbox.

See a log of files removed today here.
Shut off the bot here.
Report errors here.
If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Israeli football transfers summer 2013 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

no=|nat=ISR|name=[[Omri Ben Harush]]|pos=DF|other=from [Maccabi Netanya F.C.|Maccabi Netanya]]}}
{{Fs player|no=|nat=ISR|name=[[Moshe Abutbul]]|pos=MF|other=[from [[Ironi Nir Ramat HaSharon F.C.|Ironi Nir Ramat HaSharon]]}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 UEFA Europa League group stage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramenskoye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Flags-Chaser. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Flags-Chaser. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Flags-Chaser. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ligat Al Map 2018-19[edit]

Template:Ligat Al Map 2018-19 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:02, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]