User talk:Filmforme/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derrick Acosta (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Derrick Acosta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Derrick Acosta has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Derrick Acosta. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 13:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Amiguet (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewolka was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caroline Amiguet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lewolka (talk) 10:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Noor Razooky

Hello, Filmforme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noor Razooky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Almighty Zeus

Hello, Filmforme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Almighty Zeus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Demon Protocol (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SWinxy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Demon Protocol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SWinxy (talk) 00:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Atkinson (actor) (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Atkinson (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thom Michael Mulligan has been accepted

Thom Michael Mulligan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Carr Cavender for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carr Cavender is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carr Cavender until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 13:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Suzana Norberg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Suzana Norberg. Thanks! M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 21:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Failure! (upcoming film) (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Failure! (upcoming film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank DiPalermo (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank DiPalermo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 10:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Atkinson (actor) (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Atkinson (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 15:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merrick McCartha (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merrick McCartha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– bradv 23:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Libertyville (film) (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Libertyville (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SlySabre (talk) 03:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Wolfkind has been accepted

Sara Wolfkind, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Russell Geoffrey Banks

This redirect does not have substantive page history. The existence of a draft is not page history for a redirect, but a possibility, and is indicated by the {{R with possibilities}}. I have removed the {{R with history}} tag. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thane of East County has been accepted

Thane of East County, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 23:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carr Cavender (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carr Cavender and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Mansfield (artist) (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Mansfield (artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzana Norberg (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suzana Norberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael C. Burgess (editor) has been accepted

Michael C. Burgess (editor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

"Byron and his children" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Byron and his children has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 3 § Byron and his children until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 00:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinny Curran (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinny Curran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Not This Part of the World (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Not This Part of the World and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 13:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miracle at Manchester has been accepted

Miracle at Manchester, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shaw Jones (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shaw Jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Paredes has been accepted

Jennifer Paredes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryan Masson (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryan Masson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Almighty Zeus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Almighty Zeus. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 13:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karenssa LeGear has been accepted

Karenssa LeGear, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 07:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randy Davison (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Randy Davison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Freedom, Wisconsin (film)

Hello, Filmforme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Freedom, Wisconsin (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell Geoffrey Banks (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Russell Geoffrey Banks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

@Timtrent I can remove some refs. Would they not pass WP:NBASIC or WP:ANYBIO either? Filmforme (talk) 14:47, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

I can't spot his passing either of the less defined criteria, but others may have a different view.

With CITEKILL, we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

@Timtrent Thanks, I cleaned it up but I don't think I'll resubmit until I can find more on the subject. I appreciate the help. – Filmforme (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Start by finding references, good ones, and work from there. If they aren't available then I am afraid he is not notabe. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:47, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Almighty Zeus has been accepted

Almighty Zeus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

"Raye Richards" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Raye Richards has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Raye Richards until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raye Richards (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raye Richards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 18:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

@Spinster300 Thanks for your review and feedback. Their sources as a television personality and actress are the most significant I could find. I don’t think that was enough on its own, but the coverage I found about their marketing career covers the subject in depth in my opinion. Filmforme (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Filmforme, thank you for writing in. From what I could gauge, even the sources covering the subject's marketing career were more about the bar she worked for, and less about the subject herself. An article about the subject's workplace in USA Today or Bon Appétit is not an article about the subject herself. Since they are subscription only, I seek your clarification – do these articles simply mention the subject at her job position at the bars (for example, in a quote about the article's topic), or do they detail in several paragraphs what the subject has done while employed at that business? That is what makes the difference. The news article titles at present give the impression that the subject might only have been mentioned in passing within the article. All in all, I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, and that the subject will be more notable in the future. If her work in reality TV has garnered significant coverage, but no one source goes into significant detail about her life or career, then we can consider shortening the article to the bare minimum facts as to why she should be included on here in the first place, and leave it at that for the time being. I await your thoughts. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 18:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC).

@Spinster300 Thanks for clarifying further. Both sources quote them, but also discuss the work they do at their business. The Bon Appétit source talks about them more than just quoting them. For the source at USA Today, I included an archived link which does bypass the subscription requirement. It's similar to the Bon Appétit source but more in depth; they are quoted more here, though I do agree the article is not entirely about them.

I was hesitant to publish about their former work on TV, because most of the information I could find was not reliable or what I consider significant. I think what I've included is significant and reliable, and they were the best sources I could find. But they are all related to facts about them as they happened on the show. Thanks for your insight. – Filmforme (talk) 19:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Filmforme, thank you kindly for your response. If you would like to, please develop the draft with as many reliable sources you can find. However, I think that in this subject's case, it would be a safer bet to wait until there is significant coverage on them and their career as the main topic from reliable sources. In case it is already there in print, and unavailable online, please add that in to the article. Non-online sources (books and magazines) are acceptable, as long as someone with access can verify them. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC).

@Spinster300 I'll keep an eye out for more info. I'm considering publishing as is if other opinions say otherwise. Worse case, you think it is likely notable enough to be moved back to draftspace? Filmforme (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Filmforme, it is advisable to let drafts pass through WP:AfC. A good rule of thumb for submitting a good draft over at AfC is to imagine if the article is likely to survive a WP:AfD discussion, keeping in mind the various different notability guidelines and criteria for inclusion, such as WP:BASIC, WP:THREE, and WP:ANYBIO (among many others), that would warrant that article's inclusion into the encyclopaedia. From what I see on your user and talk pages, you have quite a good track record of this.

It might also be useful for you to take a a look at the WP:PYRAMID guideline, to understand how it is more advisable to put all the significant and notable information first, and to wisely start shorter drafts/articles (called stubs) over at AfC. This would save your time editing as well as the time of reviewers, as there is less data to sieve through and corroborate. These stubs, once accepted, can be expanded and improved into proper articles; fun fact – many A-list Hollywood actors', musicians', and celebrities' articles started out as stubs. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 20:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC).

@Spinster300 Thanks for the info, you've been very helpful. I almost always start with WP:AFC especially when it comes to WP:BLP. I have found that smaller drafts get reviewed quicker, but sometimes it takes more than 3 or 4 sources to verify notability. The queue at AfC has been much longer than the few weeks it used to be and I don't always get very detailed responses like I've had from you. So thank you.

WP:PYRAMID really helps for larger articles. I need to get in the habit of that method more often. Can I ping you for other drafts too? The specifics you provide are helpful if a draft is declined, rather than the generic response I get from other users most of the time. Filmforme (talk) 20:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Filmforme, you are very welcome! And yes, that is the nature of AfC. The backlog was the reason why I volunteered to sign up as a reviewer. And yes of course! Please feel free to reach out if you want me to see your other drafts. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Amiguet (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caroline Amiguet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 17:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Filmforme, I see that you are working on improving this article. This is a much more promising entry. Please let me know when you are done making the suggested improvements and I shall take a look. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 19:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC).

@Spinster300 Thanks, I've cleaned up based on your suggestions. Should I resubmit it? Filmforme (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Filmforme, I think the article requires some more copyediting, especially the removal of several statements that are not considered encyclopaedic. There are also some wiki linking issues which I will clean up. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 19:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC).

@Spinster300 Thanks. Permission granted if there is anything you want to change. I can resubmit or move to article space when you think it's good to go. Filmforme (talk) 19:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Filmforme, please take a look at the draft as I have edited it. All irrelevant information to her life and career was removed and the unnecessary sectioning was made more concise. The citation formatting has also been made as per the WP:MOS. Please provide citations for her education. Please also expand on her education, and her dubbing and theatre work if reliable sources support information that is interesting and notable. I will have a look when you are done. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 21:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC).

@Spinster300 Thanks, here's a link where I found their education and additional credits. I am unsure about its reliability as it looks to be self-published. Filmforme (talk) 21:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Filmforme, please remove those claims from the draft for the time being. I also think that the draft is good to go, so you may resubmit it.

Going forward, I would like you to note that primary sources (within reason) can sometimes be used to verify miscellaneous facts about a subject, but they can never be used to establish notability. A good example for this is using a self-published, primary source (such as a social media or blog post) to verify a subject's birth date or death date.

However, some primary sources are better than others – think, a celebrity's autobiography published by Simon & Schuster (who likely have some editorial control of the content and are more likely to do their due diligence in fact-checking what the celebrity claims about themselves) is more reliable than a celebrity's Instagram post which could potentially be misleading or advertising or a hoax.

I sincerely hope these insights help. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 22:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC).

@Spinster300 Understood. I have resubmitted. Thank you for all the details and specifics. Filmforme (talk) 22:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Amiguet has been accepted

Caroline Amiguet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 22:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hatred (2015 film)

Hello, Filmforme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hatred".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Heiress Lethal (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Heiress Lethal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank DiPalermo has been accepted

Frank DiPalermo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pulp Friction (film) (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M4V3R1CK32 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pulp Friction (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 02:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Burquist (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M4V3R1CK32 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin Burquist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 04:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Demon Protocol

Hello, Filmforme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Demon Protocol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gavin Michael Booth (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M4V3R1CK32 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gavin Michael Booth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 17:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Costella (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfred Costella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 09:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Froehlich (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Froehlich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merrick McCartha (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merrick McCartha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 09:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Gools (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Gools and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)