User talk:Fightmore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebronics (April 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Do check the Conflict of Interest guidelines -

Hello, Fightmore, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shyamal (talk) 04:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
70 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Woodland Worldwide (talk) Add sources
268 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Parul Chauhan (talk) Add sources
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ultra Products (talk) Add sources
45 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Geosynthetic clay liner (talk) Add sources
1,701 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Diya Aur Baati Hum (talk) Add sources
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Indian Telly Award for Best Actress in a Lead Role (talk) Add sources
457 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C JVC (talk) Cleanup
2,835 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai (talk) Cleanup
2,861 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Pardes Mein Hai Mera Dil (talk) Cleanup
3,421 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Hard disk drive (talk) Expand
2,326 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Solid-state drive (talk) Expand
378 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Mini-ITX (talk) Expand
3,753 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Kumkum Bhagya (talk) Unencyclopaedic
41 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Twister (software) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
229 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Gracenote (talk) Unencyclopaedic
521 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Seagate Technology (talk) Merge
4,094 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C OPPO Electronics (talk) Merge
134 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Social graph (talk) Merge
150 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Indian Television Academy Awards (talk) Wikify
49 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Swati Bajpai (talk) Wikify
376 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Sukirti Kandpal (talk) Wikify
39 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Be quiet! (talk) Orphan
36 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Life Reboot Nahi Hoti (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Artur Rozyyev (talk) Orphan
128 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Rajshree Thakur (talk) Stub
100 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Puja Joshi (talk) Stub
730 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Asha Negi (talk) Stub
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Small Form Factor Committee (talk) Stub
153 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Anupriya Kapoor (talk) Stub
850 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Shivangi Joshi (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebronics (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources here certainly demonstrate that this brand exists, but they don't go on to establish that the brand has achieved encyclopedic notability. More than half of the references are either product reviews or announcements. The others are just directory-type listings or routine corporate announcements. One of them is even a self-written press release. In all, I don't see how this company satisfies either the guidelines at WP:NCORP or the more general guidelines at WP:GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebronics (May 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I can see that some effort has been made to improve the references since the article was last declined, but nothing that can be done to the article can change whether the subject is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia or not.

The references are either trivial mentions of the company, or press releases like the one for the silent mouse.

I also note that articles about this company have been deleted four times previously.

Wikipedia is not the place to promote your company or products.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:18, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Fightmore, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:18, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebronics (May 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I can see that you're trying to improve the article by removing text that appears to be promotional, but I think you're missing the fundamental point. Not enough has been written about the company by indepenent, reliable sources to warrant an article about the company here.

None of the following come even close to providing substantial coverage about the company from independent, reliable sources:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 06:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebronics (May 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
per WP:PROMO. Author has been blocked.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 07:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Zebronics[edit]

Draft:Zebronics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zebronics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Zebronics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Yashovardhan (talk) 15:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)[edit]

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution[edit]

In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:

(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Project Tiger Writing Contest[edit]

In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:

Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject India[edit]

Namaste, Fightmore. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.



Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge[edit]

WikiProject India Hello Fightmore. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: 
{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fightmore&oldid=1089581749"