User talk:Fbrody

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Fbrody, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Fbrody. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:17, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond as to whether you have a conflict of interest with Marc Lesser or have been paid to create Mark Lesser's article. Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have NOT been paid to create the article on Marc Lesser. I have no conflict of interest beyond knowing Marc Lesser personally and I gain nothing from writing in a positive or negative way. I have been studying Zen with Marc Lesser for over 10 years and never had any economic relationship with him. I am doing my best to write in a neutral, uninvolved, and factual voice. If you feel that any passage is not formulated in a neutral way, please let me know and I will correct it. Marc Lesser also has not asked me to write the article; I also researched multiple other personalities on Wikipedia before deciding to create the entry. Florian Brody (talk) 05:09, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. Studying Zen with Marc Lesser for 10 years means you do have a WP:COI - see WP:EXTERNALREL, a personal relationship also means you have a COI. See also WP:COISELF: "You should generally refrain from creating articles about yourself, or anyone you know" Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So - what do you suggest as a good next step to ensure the article fulfills all requirements for Wikipedia? Thank you . Florian Brody (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let us see what the result of the the discussion on deletion is. And for any future articles you create for which you have a COI including a personal relationship, you are strongly recommended to use the Articles for Creation process Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:07, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for advice - I will definitely do that in the future; regarding the discussion on deletion, the main concern was that the reference material is not of high enough quality and there is not enough; this will be fixed over the next days.Florian Brody (talk) 06:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marc Lesser for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Lesser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Lesser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:21, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your email, I'd first say that it is easier if we speak on here than on email; and that if there are indeed good sources out there, please present them at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Lesser. Thanks Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New materials added and quotations correctedFlorian Brody (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please point me to help materials how to add links to videos with talks and/or interviews for a person to add to a BLP page.

The videos will no be embedded or included, they will be referenced similar to a book the BLP person wrote. Thank you Florian Brody (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One would hope it's a reliable source; if it is, you can format it in an inline citation like described so, or put it under an "external links" section header. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Fbrody, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Marc Lesser have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GenieTown[edit]

The article GenieTown has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 06:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

agreed - please delete - GenieTown did not develop as expected. Florian Brody (talk) 07:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yunshui ^雲 _水 00:26, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes[edit]

FYI: I moved this entire section to appropriate talk page at Talk:Florian Brody#Some proposed changes. It took me a bit to understand what page you were even requesting changes at. —Uzume (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you — Florian Brody (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dani Essindi Behrendt (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please address WP:COI. The original submitter of this article was blocked for abusing multiple accounts and undisclosed paid editing. All statements need to be sourced, for example the entire personal life section here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dani Essindi Behrendt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fbrody! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]