User talk:Falseness

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of DavidYork71 (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Troy Davis case appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Uncle Milty (talk) 02:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Criminal Infobox has been commented upon on talk. Where's your contribution to that??

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Troy Davis case, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lawton's opinions are just that. Uncle Milty (talk) 03:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So the remarks of Lawton, who prosecuted the case are 'my opinion'. And therefore what you've had to say above isn't actually you talking, it's .. Santa Claus

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 06:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked as a result of your editing; the nature of the edits and the way they were made are wholly unsuitable for a collaborative site such as Wikipedia, especially when they concern biographies of living people. Your behaviour is also in keeping with that of a known sockpuppeteer who has edited the same articles in the past few days. Nick (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/InconvenientlyFactual for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 06:49, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]