User talk:Factsonlybaby

Welcome

Hello, Factsonlybaby, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Factsonlybaby, good luck, and have fun. – Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Robert Sepúlveda Jr.. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: |image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]], instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: |image=SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Factsonlybaby, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Factsonlybaby. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Robert Sepúlveda Jr., you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 21:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

@GermanJoe: The conflict of interest issue has continued. If you take a look at the user's recent contributions you can see the removal of mass amounts of information, which is a continual issue. This user has acted outside of a neutral point of view. Kelege (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Finding Prince Charming, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

@Jim1138: It's because this account is associated with Robert Sepúlveda Jr. and most likely works in public relations hence why anything "negative" is removed as well as the original edits read like a resume. You can also see the recent contributions all pertain to the clients details and experience such as the Draft:Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks Kelege (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Minor editing

I've noticed your reverts and removal of mass chunks of information are referred to as minor edits. I'd advise you not select that your edits are minor unless they actually are. Behavior like this is a violation of Wikipedia's policies, as well as it reiterates your conflict of interest. Read more info on Wikipedia's editing policies Kelege (talk) 16:53, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Finding Prince Charming. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chase (talk) 22:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Robert Sepúlveda Jr., you may be blocked from editing. -- Gestrid (talk) 23:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Sepúlveda Jr.. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 23:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest with Robert Sepúlveda Jr/Finding Prince Charming

Your continuous edits (removing mass amounts of sourced information) is disruptive. You have been address prior about your conflict of interest and and have been advised to not edit pages pertaining to you, friends/family and clients and to discuss on the talk page pertaining to the article in question first. You have repeatedly done the opposite. I would advise you to stop your disruptive edits as you may be reported and further action, blocking your account, may be taken. Kelege (talk) 11:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

I am Robert. I AM NOT 40 something. Someone else keeps editing this page and added things that are not true! I though wiki has a reliable source for information. ALSO - i added photos of myself that I took with my Iphone then edited and someone deleted them all! I explained to him I took the photos but he gave me a very hard time.

How about you help and actually source facts. I am only trying to manage this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factsonlybaby (talk • contribs) 01:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

If you really are Robert, you can send some verification of your identity to the WP:OTRS by emailing them privately at info-en-q@wikimedia.org. — Gestrid (talk) 01:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

You took the photos with your iPhone?

• c:File:RobertSepulvedaJrFindingPrinceCharming.jpg , deleted by Hedwig in Washington (Copyright violation: watermarked Logo tv).
• c:File:Robert Sepulveda Jr. Interior Designer.jpg , deleted by Hedwig in Washington (Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work
• c:File:Robert Sepulveda Jr. Interior DesignerLGBTQ+ activistModelFinding Prince Charming Bachelor.jpg , deleted by Hedwig in Washington (Copyright violation, found elsewher.
• c:File:RobertSepulvedaJrWorking.jpg , deleted by Hedwig in Washington (Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -
• c:File:RobertSepulvdaJrandMerlySepulvedaHRCgala.jpg , deleted by Hedwig in Washington (Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work

Doesn't look like you took them with your iPhone.

As to your age, is there a wp:Reliable source showing your age? Jim1138 (talk) 22:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is COI, Edit warring, by Factsonlybaby. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 22:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued removal of material, as you did at Robert Sepúlveda Jr. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing the same behavior as soon as the previous block expires. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Factsonlybaby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am Robert Sepulveda Jr. I've been trying to add my photos and get false information off my wiki page as well as to add my age. I have already sent in my drivers licence for proof of age as well as the form allowing wiki to use my photos. Factsonlybaby (talk) 01:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That "false content" was based on reports in reputable publications, including People. If they got it wrong, you should contact them directly. Removing well-soured content from Wikipedia is not acceptable. Huon (talk) 01:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I didn't state the "false content" I meant my AGE. Why are you assuming you know what im talking about when I haven't even stated it? As I said, A) I sent in the form allowing wiki to use my photos and allowing anyone else to use my photo. B) I sent in my drivers license for proff of age. C) I would like the photos I uploaded resorted, if someone cant be restored then have the other that can be restores restored. It shouldn't be this much work to edit my own page. --Factsonlybaby (talk) 20:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

You said you tried to "get false information off my wiki page". You weren't talking about your age there, were you? Even if you were, removing an incorrect birthdate wouldn't be an issue and wouldn't have seen you blocked (adding a birthdate without a reliable published source is another matter, and sending a scan of your driver's license won't help, but again that's not what you were blocked for). You have a history of removing well-sourced content from the page, and that is what you're blocked for. I assumed you were at least trying to address that issue. If you weren't I apologize for the misunderstanding, but that's what you should address if you want to make another unblock request. On an unrelated note, Wikipedia takes a rather dim view of people writing about themselves. Of course you are welcome to point out errors, but it's strongly suggested that editors with a conflict of interest, like yourself, do not edit the article in question directly but rather propose changes on the talk page and leave it to uninvolved editors to determine whether the proposed changes would improve the article. Huon (talk) 21:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

A "dim view" is allowing people to edit my page and write false information that ISN'T sourced by, as you call it a, "reliable published source" - a random blog is a reliable source? Look back at the edits made to this page and youll see that's what I've been fighting, as well as getting the photos I give ANYONE permission to use undeleted. Go back and look at what the "history" of what I deleted has been - you'll see someone was making malicious edits, you should be blocking them. As per my own website my age is clearly posted,( ), how much more reliable do you want to get? My driver's license isn't enough? My webpage isn't enough? Or would it be better in your eyes if a random blog stated my age? Want me to point out an error, heres one: Why dont you allow me to list all my jobs I had in college, why allow someone to just state one? Wouldn't it be fair to state how many jobs I had whilst in college? So - like I've been asking - I would like the photos I took with my iphone that I have given permission to wiki and everyone and anyone to use to be reinstated. I would also like to add my correct age, as well as ALL the jobs I had in college. --Factsonlybaby (talk) 23:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

There are two issues here that from Wikipedia's point of view are unrelated: Firstly, getting incorrect information off the page - as I said, you are welcome to point out errors; in fact, other editors removed all incorrect information about your age long before your last few edits. Secondly, adding content. Wikipedia should summarize what reliable secondary sources have reported about you. You do not get a special dispensation allowing you to add whatever you like - not even if it's true (and I'm sure you're familiar with the idea that people might lie about their age - I'm not saying you're doing so, but accepting your website as proof would set a bad precedent; on the other hand, your driver's license is not a published source that our readers can look up on their own to verify what age it gives). If no independent source has written about those other jobs you had in college, they apparently are not a significant part of your biography - no more so than, say, your favourite dish, your primary school grades or similar trivia. Due to your obvious conflict of interest, you are not in a good position to neutrally assess what topics the article about you should cover.

None of this, however, addresses the reason for your block. You're welcome to make another unblock request that atually discusses what you were blocked for. Huon (talk) 12:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks

Hello, Factsonlybaby. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Atlanta Rainbow Crosswalks".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 18:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)