User talk:Fabstoflops

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Help me[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

It says whenever I try to log into Huggle, "Use of Huggle on this project requires rollback.". What do I have to do now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabstoflops (talk • contribs) 18:03, 5 September 2010

See here WP:Rollback--Imagine Wizard (talk • contribs • count) Iway amway Imagineway Izardway. 18:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

You have to apply for the rollback right and get approved by an admin to use rollback. You may want to use twinkle instead. Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 18:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

Hi there Fabstoflops.

When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured to the right.

I'm sorry, but you won't be able to use Huggle for a while, because you do require the rollback permission – and for that, you need a proven track-record; typically more than 500 edits, and experience fighting real vandalism here on Wikipedia.

If you go to Special:RecentChanges, you can help us remove vandalism, either with the undo function, or the userscript, Twinkle.

After some time, you could consider applying for rollback permission. Best, Chzz ► 18:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

adminhelp|Is there any proof that I am Bonkers189? I don't know who is Bonkers189, and all it says is the contribs are Bonkers189, and they were all relating to reverting edits. What do I do now to be unblocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fabstoflops (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is there any proof that I am Bonkers189? I don't know who is Bonkers189, and all it says is the contribs are Bonkers189, and they were all relating to reverting edits. What do I do now to be unblocked?

Decline reason:

After looking more closely, I see a great deal. You have the same interest as the Bonkers189 socks in Tom and Jerry cartoons, as indicated by the two deleted articles you created. The latter article was originally created by User:Catkitty45, a checkuser confirmed member of the sockfarm. Finally, there is the fact that this account was created the day after the sockfarm all got blocked.--Chaser (talk) 19:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{help|If a user requests Checkuser on me in a sock investigation, what's the latter of what could happen after Checkuser is complete?}}

If the checkuser is run, the checkuser running the check will report their findings; generally, they will say that it is

Confirmed,

Likely, or

Possible that you are related to another account, or that you are

Unrelated. Depending on these results, and of a comparison of behavior, a block may be issued. Your account is already blocked, so I'm guessing this already happened. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser evidence was completed before this account was created. --Fabstoflops (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]