User talk:Etimo

Dardania is one othe first clan in EU, it is the fathers of Troy,Pellazgian, Dardania, Dacia , Dalmatia, and the female Dodona, the mighty G A , made this clan human giant but the ward D , com ftom Drita , light , the ward it self Dardania, Drit-dhana, I gave light, Troy , Land , Dacia , Dhaqi, Give , Dalmatia, Del-matan, get on the other side, Dodona , E-jona, is ours , Albania Illyric history can not be told is hidden, so that every country in EU keep there fake identity, and the history can be told from someone sitting in the office, not based on facts and books hidden in vatican, and scattered around the world, GAOTU, SMIB.*. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C48E:FC00:201B:C927:B737:6580 (talk) 10:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Talk:René Redzepi. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Banner talk 16:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not attacking you, I'm attacking you're methodology which in my view is totally wrong and biased. Don't attack the person if you can't attack his arguments!! It's my constitutional right to express what I think is wrong, and again, in my view this is the case. Pretty simple!!Etimo (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:René Redzepi. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Banner talk 17:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Alexikoua (talk) 11:27, 14 December 2013 (UTC) What is disruptive about my edit please? My edit is a simple summary about what has been discovered on the issue so far, and what reflects the actual state of things in view of Albanian vocabulary. The content of the section in question, as it is at the present state, is misleading to say at least, and does not give an accurate picture of modern Albanian lexicon. Do you delete also referenced material? Based on what? thank you Etimo (talk) 13:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Etimo The Banner talk 23:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Rene Redzepi".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:

It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:

Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! --Guy Macon (talk) 02:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the notification. Why has the discussion been archived without a proper investigation from third parties? To whom should I talk to in order to have such an arbitration on the issue? Thank youEtimo (talk) 08:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Legal threats at Talk:René Redzepi[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Legal threats at Talk:René Redzepi.The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you. —Guy Macon (talk) 09:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Etimo, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Etimo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of reconstructed Dacian words may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Etimo. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 11:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dougweller (talk) 11:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dardani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Alexikoua (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are my editing disruptive?? As you can see they are properly sourced..could you be more precise about where the problem lies? thanks Etimo (talk) 00:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]