User talk:Emvfr

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Emvfr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as SmartFocus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SmartFocus[edit]

The article SmartFocus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note you were the page creator, not the owner. The page was deleted for the reasons explained above. The logo had nothing to do with it - rather, the sources present in the article did not suggest the subject is notable. If you think it is notable, you can make such argument at WP:REFUND. But please note that Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages, and not all businesses are encyclopedic. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from SmartFocus with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Hello Emvfr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Emvfr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Emvfr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Citobun (talk) 10:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Hello, I am not being compensated. I made edits to add more reliable sources and changed wording so it did not sound like an advertisement. Rebecca[reply]

re: SmartFocus reliable sources issue[edit]

Please note that the discussion of this topic is taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartFocus. Of course, adding better sources and describing them at the discussion page is one of the best courses of action. Please also make sure you've read and understood Wikipedia:Notability (corporations). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SmartFocus Corporate Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SmartFocus Corporate Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]