User talk:Eminent Philosopher

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Environmental policy of the Donald Trump administration seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Editorializing.

Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Wikipedia:Introduction; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources; Wikipedia:Citing sources; Help:Footnotes; Wikipedia:Verifiability; Wikipedia:No original research; Wikipedia:Neutral point of view; Wikipedia:Notability; Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons; Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not; Wikipedia:Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Wikipedia:Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 22:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for these links and your advice.Eminent Philosopher (talk) 00:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cabinet of Donald Trump. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your views. My edits were not vandalism, howeeverEminent Philosopher (talk) 22:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Economic policy of Donald Trump. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sorry. I should have refrained from that. I dispute tjat anyone calls it “MAGAnomics” or why that would be relevant, though.Eminent Philosopher (talk) 00:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Eminent Philosopher: Wikipedia is not for your opinions. Content on Wikipedia has a neutral point of view. Wikipedia does not believe Trump's cabinet is "the worst ever" and such content belongs on Historical rankings of presidents of the United States if anywhere. Furthermore, your edit calling Trump's economic policies a "plutocrat's wet dream" was a blatant violations of the rules. Nuke (talk) 23:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok, fine. I added a source for one of those, though. Eminent Philosopher (talk) 23:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

are you really a monarchist? And if so, why would you possibly want the King to be Donald Trump? Not only is he arguably already suffering from dementia, his children all appear to be borderline mentally retarded. Can’t see how that would work out well. Eminent Philosopher (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]