User talk:Ellgee24

Ellgee24, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Ellgee24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brayton Purcell, LLP.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! EricEnfermero ^Howdy! 04:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ellgee24. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by AppleJack7_{Dear Princess Celestia...} 00:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation

Brayton Purcell, LLP, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AppleJack7_{Dear Princess Celestia...} 00:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Ellgee24. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Deleting_a_Wiki_Page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Brayton Purcell, LLP

Hello, I reverted your removal of well-referenced information from the article. If you are connected with this law firm, I suggest that you read conflict of interest. It may be that the article as currently written places undue weight on a single case. But it is not appropriate to remove well-referenced content without discussion or an explanation. Expansion of the article in compliance with policies and guidelines is the best solution. I know that you are new to Wikipedia, but you have to understand that we are here to build a neutral, well referenced encyclopedia. We don't host promotional articles about law firms or any other businesses. Once you introduced the topic to Wikipedia, you opened up the article to editing by anyone, anywhere, who wants to edit the article in compliance with our policies and guidelines. Feel free to ask questions on my talk page. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)