User talk:9cfilorux

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Ekips39)
  • Please leave new messages by clicking here.
  • If not directed otherwise I will respond to you wherever you have left your comment. If you want me to always respond on your talk page and not mine, please say so. If I have left a message on your talk page I'll keep an eye on it to see if you reply there.

Smile :D[edit]

PHANTOMTECH (talk) 04:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

:) ekips39talk 20:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me keep piggywinkle![edit]

You have basically ruined my dream by speedy deleting piggywinkle. Please reconsider. Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please! Writer freak (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC) please please pleeeeeeeaaaaaasssssse[reply]

Thx for pointing out my error...[edit]

...at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Advocacy_ducks#Wikipedia:Advocacy_ducks. I would not have minded if you had fixed the Wikilink but either way, it's fixed now. Happy editing! Atsme☎️📧 12:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) ekips39 (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response[edit]

I totally would (it's a good idea and a nice thought) but, as I mentioned, it's not possible to do so because of the block placed on editing the page by Wikipedia. Therefore, the closest we can get to actually getting this issue noticed is to go to the page of the parent company. Of course, that is not the place to mention the irresponsibility of the daughter company, because it is largely irrelevant due to the independence of the daughter company and the fact that the oil spill was the responsibility of the daughter company. If the daughter company's page is made editable again, then edits to the parent company's page will not longer occur and information about the oil spill will be added in a neutral and factually supported fashion onto the daughter company's page (seriously, I promise references). As long as this is not possible, there is nothing else for us to do. Thank you and have a smile :) Ioanna.hearts.you (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ioanna.hearts.you: I see -- but you can go to Talk:Shell Oil Company and propose a change there, and you should also be able to edit Shell Oil Company yourself because it's only semi-protected and you meet the requirements for being autoconfirmed (though you didn't until today). I see you're now blocked, which is unfortunate, but when it expires feel free to try these suggestions. ekips39 (talk) 21:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 05:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Ive been pretty busy myself, so I just now noticed you've been gone a lot lately. I hope you can soon find the time to get back to full life because I really miss you. Soap 05:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Soap. I'm not a very useful editor but it's nice to know I'm missed. I expect to be around more later this month, when the RL commitments wind down. Also, any reason this is a subsection? ekips39❀talk 20:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I miss your face[edit]

Hey, Ekips39. Haven't seen you on IRC in awhile. Just seeing how you're doing; hope you're doing well and I hope to see you around sometime :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:58, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thank you for your logo design for m:Research:Revision scoring as a service. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 09:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Logo design, an iteration proposal[edit]

Hi, I am curious if you could perhaps modify the logo a little. We did not notice this until recently but the design is very similar to the letters AI already. Perhaps the red circle could be moved a little higher (within the triangle)... Think of the letter A and how there is a triangle in the letter. That would contain the red circle (the dot of an i). The bottom part of the green triangle would be the bottom part of the (ı). Just a thought if you have the time. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Male film score composers - purpose of this category?[edit]

Could you kindly explain what is the purpose of this category? Film score composing, surely, is not at all demonstrably something of which the quality or nature of the result is anything to do at all with the gender of its creator? In other words, I can't see what encyclopaedic purpose there is in making such a category, but I would be glad to be enlightened if there is such a reason. Alfietucker (talk) 10:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I only created it because Category:Female film score composers already exists and having one but not the other is just weird. I couldn't say why these categories are of any use. Perhaps you could ask Scarecroe, who created the female category. ekips39❀talk 17:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes[edit]

I never did such a thing!I believe you have made a mistake!Please stop accusing me on this!!!It was blamed on me twice!Got it!Well, I do not want to see you talking to me in such rude manners again!

Hi Ekips39... last year, you added {{restricted use}} to File:Simplified historical map of Ukrainian borders 1654-2014.jpg... but it does not appear on MediaWiki:Bad_image_list. Could you clarify this please? Thanks, Storkk (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file was originally named File:Map of Ukraine borders 1654 - 2014.jpg and that name is still on the list. The list should probably be updated to reflect this. ekips39❀talk 22:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it in danger of being used maliciously? I see on Commons it has two global uses, one on a talk page here and another on a talk page on ruwiki. Storkk (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know the details of why it was put on the list in the first place -- it's possible that whatever malicious use prompted that isn't going to happen again. If you think it's not going to be an issue you can ask for it to be removed from the list. ekips39❀talk 18:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's been awhile...[edit]

I just wanted to leave you a message to say hi! I haven't seen you on IRC in awhile; just wanted to see how you are and keep in touch with you. Hope things are going well for you. Hope to hear back from you soon :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oshwah. Nice to hear from you. I'm doing all right, but I've been busy with school and whatnot. I may reappear. I hope you're doing well too. ekips39❀talk 03:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm doing alright as well. I thought I'd say hello and see how you are. I certainly hope you return, but I'm very much glad that you're setting good priorities: school and life most definitely comes first :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Section header[edit]

Hello there. Just so you know, the user editing from 174.107.66.17 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was trying to attack you with that message you replied to. That's probably why you had no idea what he or she meant. As such, I have reverted his or her changes and have notified him or her on his or her talk page appropriately. Please don't hesitate to discuss it further with me if you believe I shouldn't have done this. Thanks, <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. :) I still don't see how I linked anyone to a penis. I would have liked to come to an understanding with the person, but that probably won't be feasible. ekips39 (talk) 05:15, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My contributions[edit]

I honestly thought the information I contributed to the Gang River page on wikipedia was accurate information, from a source I thought was reliable. I was clearing up some of the confusing language wikipedia uses, making it more children friendly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.155.206.251 (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Ekips39. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification that access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily revoked due to inactivity[edit]

Hello Ekips3a! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily revoked. If you do not resume editing within the next week your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II (talk) 19:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Ekips39/sandbox/2[edit]

User:Ekips39/sandbox/2, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ekips39/sandbox/2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ekips39/sandbox/2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 06:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheGracefulSlick: Oops... sorry about that. ekips39 (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ekips39. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

so glad to see you back!!!

Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, L235. Fluffy. I like cats. I'm not sure why anybody cares about me on Wikipedia -- it's huge, and I do next to nothing. Oh well... ekips39 (talk) 04:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The hart school[edit]

If you change the page one more time i will ddos wikipedia :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.54.141 (talk) 21:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really? ekips39 (talk) 21:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How did you find this? Special:Search shows no matches for "abuse log" in the MediaWiki namespace. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Suffusion of Yellow: I added &uselang=qqx to the URL of a history page. It shows the names of all the interface messages being used. If you try it you'll see what I mean. e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:AfC_draft_editintro&action=history&uselang=qqx You probably couldn't find it through Special:Search because it doesn't technically exist (isn't locally customized). ekips39 (talk) 18:17, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(ping not received) Thanks! Handy trick. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sorry[edit]

sorry, I didn't mean to erase anything. thanks for fixing it though! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.121.144 (talk) 00:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem -- good to know. Might want to be more careful next time :) ekips39 (talk) 01:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ekips39. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male guitarists has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Male guitarists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 02:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages consultation 2019[edit]

The Wikimedia Foundation has invited the various Wikimedia communities, including the English Wikipedia, to participate in a consultation on improving communication methods within the Wikimedia projects. As such, a request for comment has been created at Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019. You are invited to express your views in the discussion. ~ Winged BladesGodric 05:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of link language wrapper templates (June 2019)[edit]

A discussion has started about wrapper templates of {{Link language}}. You may be interested in participating because you participated in a related previous discussion. E^pi*i batch (talk) 03:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC) (Retro is my main account.)[reply]

I did? Probably something years ago that I don't remember. 9cfilorux (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We miss you![edit]

Hope you've been keeping well Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@L235: Hi Kevin, hope you're doing well too. I'm fine, but I don't know if I'll come back as an editor. There's too much wrong here. 9cfilorux (talk) 05:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Richard Noble (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]