User talk:Ebmom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gena and Chris, please STOP deleting the links to EBAN and EB Info World from the EB page here. I leave your links alone, don't I? I have class. Something you sorely lack. Then again, both your mouth runs so wild with lies, why should I be surprised? It's just who you are. GROW UP! To pick on people with severely sick children is deplorable. May God have mercy on your souls. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ebmom (talkcontribs).

July 2007[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Epidermolysis Bullosa. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Versageek 01:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to your comments on User talk:Liberty1960: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The sad thing is that Gena herself has been attacking me for over 2 years. I've finally had enough. She even started an entire group just to bad mouth me and attack me, lie about me and the list goes on. SHE is the one that needs to stop attacking me. SHE is the one that needs to stay cool and SHE is the one, along with her 'friends', who need to quit deleting the links to EBAN and EB Info World and stop claiming that EBAN is an illegal organization (lies) and that EB Info World is full of misinformation (more lies). All she is capable of doing is lying. Lies lies, lies. I never met a bigger vindictive liar in my entire life.

Regarding the removal of links[edit]

On my talk page, you said "I have never removed the Walk a Mile to EB." [1]

However, I observe this edit [2] at Susan Tom and this edit [3] at Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Could you kindly reconcile your statement against those two edits, where the link to the Walk a Mile event was removed or overwritten? Regards, —C.Fred (talk) 17:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay-so maybe I did once because I was mad that they kept deleting mine. However, that was just that one instance. If you will notice, they deleted my links over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

Blocked[edit]

I have blocked you for sockpuppetry, abuse, attacks, spamming and harassment. If you continue to add these links the sites will be blacklisted. Guy (Help!) 19:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How sad. I don't have multiple accounts. I only have one. I am the victim in this. Gena has been harrassing me for 2 years and it continues. Thank you for allowing her harrassment to go on through you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ebmom (talkcontribs) 14:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I observe that this account is barely two weeks old. Either you do have other Wikipedia accounts—in which case the sockpuppetry accusation is affirmed—or your complaints extend from activities elsewhere—in which case it can be argued that you followed them here to carry on your grudge, which would enter the realm of harassment. In neither case does it justify inappropriate conduct. —C.Fred (talk) 05:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never added or edited anything from Wikipedia before I created this account, hence your accusations are FALSE. I am not the one with the grudge. Gena was voted out of the EBAN board and SHE is the one with the 2 year old grudge. I was simply adding my links and she was the one that kept deleting them, I just marely re-instated them. This is not about Wikipedia, just the 'latest' of her attacks. She has written to the Attorney General of the US, of California, the Dept of Agricolture and others telling them that EBAN is non-compliant (a lie) and asking them to shut us down. She placed a bogus complaint with Yahoo which resulted in one of my Yahoo IDs to be deleted. She makes all kinds of outlandish and false claims that no-one bothers to investigate because if they did, they would know they are bogus. Just makes me very sad that everyone thinks I am the one with the grudge when all I have ever done is tring to defend myself from a liar. I've done nothing at Wikipedia that was inappropriate or harrassing, all I was doing was trying to add my links, which were promptly deleted by Gena. I am the victim here!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ebmom (talkcontribs).

Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to settle your off-wiki disputes. We're not concerned about what has happened off of Wikipedia, we are concerned about your conduct on it. You have used multiple accounts abusively to continue your edit war, hence you are blocked. Shadow1 (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also beg to differ; you have committed inappropriate, harassing acts at Wikipedia: this talk comment edit summary of this change this talk comment implies a willingness to violate three-revert ruleC.Fred (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. I am the victim here, and everyone knows it. I do hope you also blocked Gena and Chris because if you did not, you are their enabler. They were the ones that kept deleting my links, my only fault was adding them back and I am the one that gets blocked! Nice. By blacklisting two important links, one a non-profit organization (EBAN) and another website who is listed in many places as 'the' source of information for EB families, my opinion of Wikipedia is now officially destroyed. I will make sure everyone knows about it. Thanks!

Deletion request[edit]

Your request to delete your user talk page has been declined. We do not generally delete talk pages, as they serve as a record of a person's history on Wikipedia. Shadow1 (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, I am happy you did not delete it, this way everyone knows the whole story of what lenght vindictive people will go to. THANKS!