User talk:Eat At Joes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi![edit]

Anything from Chadbryant will be deleted or reverted. Anything which could be considered vandalism will be removed. All other comments are welcome. --Eat At Joes 04:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Howdy, Eat At Joes, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

Additional tips[edit]

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

Be Bold!![edit]

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Joe I 04:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPA[edit]

Please review our policy on No Personal Attacks, and consider your comments to Chadbryant accordingly. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great, if he weren't constantly vandalising my user page and re-adding personal attacks of his that I remove. Then there's the numerous other behaviors he engages in, up to and including violation of several Wikipedia policies. --Eat At Joes 02:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A person using the account "User:Chadbryant." (note the period on the end; it is not the same account as User:Chadbryant), vandalised your user page. I have reverted the changes. - Conrad Devonshire 23:37, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for catching that. I was not aware of this vandalism as I did not access the page on that date. I will try to be more aware in the future but it is good to have someone like you watching out for things like that. You have my gratitude and support for your swift revision. --Eat At Joes 04:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chad[edit]

Isn't there some way of getting him banned? The list of complaints against him is a mile long. I've been banned for a day or week for MUCH MUCH less. Like reverting info 3 times I know is right...why should vandals ever win? WillC 02:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with Chad lies...well, with a lot of things, but one of the larger ones is the fact that he is a sociopath. He is the kid who would tell on others on the playground to try to get in nicer with the teachers. He is the same type of person who would throw a spitball at the teacher but when she would turn around he would have a halo around his head. He is a lying, weasling, manipulative sociopath and will do whatever necessary to try to sway things his way. See Curps as a good example; Chad has Curps manipulated to the point of almost fanatical radicalism; thus, whenever something is going on that Chad doesn't like or comments are being made that he disagrees with, he runs to Curps to complain.
I've dealt with him for years. He's stolen my identity on numerous occassions and harrassed my family directly. He's smug, insensitive, and frankly isn't really worth the trouble due to his behavior. He must have a sad and horrible life. He will keep this sort of thing up for hours, days, weeks, so long as he believes he is right or can continue to make it seem as if he is to others.
The easiest way to deal with him is to stay within the limits of Wikipedia. You'll note he is being very sensitive (and also very careful) about the 3RR rule as a result of having been banned twice. He has been threatened with an additional ban regarding it after he was called out by a Wikipedia administrator on his bullshit claims of "vandalism" through revertings. This was something he had done literally hundreds of times up to that point.
He purposely goads others and skirts the rules; he believes himself better than you and only cares for himself. If you truly want him gone from Wikipedia, document his behaviors other than the 3RR reverts (but be sure to include them) and take your case to the administrators. I'm sure that others, such as TruthCrusader and myself, would be more than happy to assist you. --Eat At Joes 02:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Further personal attacks, on Chadbryant or anyone else, could lead to you being blocked from editing. Please be civil. Rhobite 02:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'm sure you meant the other guy and not me, referring to the fact that the edit was called "Fat Chad?" Have you seen his picture? But I digress...I'm not sure who exactly you meant, but I will make an effort to be more civil in the future. You might, however, want to tell Chadbryant that, since he has the personality of a warthog when it comes to interacting on Wikipedia. --Eat At Joes 02:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Personality of a warthog" is yet another personal attack, so I doubt the sincerity of your promise. If you see any personal attacks from Chad, feel free to let me know. Aside from that, this is the last warning you'll get from me about personal attacks. Please don't use them under any circumstance. Rhobite 02:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry...are you a warthog fan? Must be that whole Lion King thing. I am not using personal attacks - it is Chad who is doing this. Do you require specific examples to back up my claims? It may take some time, but I have no problem searching archives and edit histories for them. --Eat At Joes 02:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Recent examples would be preferable. Rhobite 02:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although you're allowed to post constructive comments on Chadbryant's talk page, please do not repost them if he deletes them. Basically, it's his talk page, he can do what he likes. I think it would be more productive if he engaged in discussion with you, but it's his choice. It seems like you're just trying to annoy him right now. Rhobite 04:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to annoy him. I'm trying to show him how childish and immature he appears by doing what it is he is doing through the page. However, if he wishes to look childish and immature, I certainly am not going to stand in his efforts to do so. --Eat At Joes 19:32, 04:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why is chad bryant hated so much throughout the internet? i looked up chad on google and all i could find was him getting ripped on cause he said he wasn't fat and had a six pack and named his kids after wrestlers (owen hart, stone cold), oh and also said he was so sergent.

please fill me in on this cause for some reason a LOT of people hate him. why? --3bulletproof16 19:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RSPW/FARVA[edit]

As usual, he is wrong By the way, do you post to RSPW? WillC 02:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I used to, but work has kept me busy. Chad is amusing and good for a laugh, sort of like tipping a sleeping cow, but if you have to be at work at 8:00 a.m. and you can only get to the cow at 2:00 a.m. after you're sure the farmer has gone to sleep, guess which one you are going to choose? By the way, just FYI "Farva" is some idiot (note to Rhobite: that's not intended as a personal attack, but if you believe it is one then notify me or edit it please) who posts to rec.sport.pro-wrestling. He is a troll there, just like Chad, and as a result is frequently mocked and widely disliked (just like Chad) --Eat At Joes 02:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No one is less liked than Chad Bryant. WillC 02:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eat_At_Joes&oldid=1145075622"